Showing posts with label commodity investing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label commodity investing. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 04, 2010

Peak Oil Update: Why the US is in Dire Energy Straits

How's the oil supply looking in the US?  Not particularly good, writes our good friend and colleague David Galland.

After a brief respite during the Great Deleveraging, as oil dropped to $35/barrel, it's been on a relentless climb back up.  David dives into the supply and demand fundamentals facing America here...

***

Three Mile Island for U.S. Oil

By David Galland, Managing Director, Casey Energy Report

Willie Shakespeare may have summed it up best when, borrowing the voice of King Richard III, he penned “A horse! A horse! My kingdom for a horse!”

History is replete with examples of how, but for the proverbial horse, kingdoms have been lost.

My reference point is an accident that will almost certainly lead to tragic miscalculations and havoc down the road. And, I might add, an exceptional opportunity for the patient and attentive investor.

It has to do with an impending shortage of easily accessible (read: inexpensive) oil to quench the insatiable thirst of the United States.

It’s also connected to the inroads the cash-rich and geopolitically ambivalent Chinese – among others – have been making in building strategic relationships, and making direct investments, with the world’s major energy providers.

With only so much oil to go around, every new off-take agreement signed by the Chinese with the Saudis or Venezuelans, for example, is a net loss in supply to other bidders, notably the world’s largest energy consumer, the United States.

That the Chinese, and other countries, are aggressively securing long-term energy arrangements, coincidental with what appears to be an official U.S. diplomatic initiative to actively offend all the major energy producers, makes the securing of U.S.-controlled reserves and production critical.

The problem with cheap oil can be seen in the chart here.



And it has been confirmed in a recent report issued by the U.S. military, conveniently summarized by DailyFinance: “A recent Joint Operating Environment report issued by the U.S. Joint Forces Command suggests that the U.S. could face oil shortages much sooner than many have anticipated.

“The report speculates that by 2012, surplus oil production capacity will dry up; by 2015, the world could face shortages of nearly 10 million barrels per day; and by 2030, the world will require production of 118 million barrels of oil per day, but will produce only 100 million barrels a day.”

Bottom line: The U.S. needs secure oil sources, and “on the double,” as a military type might say. And so the pressure has increased for the U.S. government to remove its actual and effective regulatory bans on offshore drilling.

While it’s more smoke than fire, the Obama administration recently made a tentative step in that direction – because even though its most ardent supporters may hate the extractive industries, Team Obama is not stupid enough to think that the energy gap is going to be closed by solar or wind power anytime soon.

Which brings us to the lost horse in this drama – the messy sinking of an oil rig off the coast of Louisiana, resulting in a spill of about 5,000 barrels, or 210,000 gallons, a day into the Gulf. It is estimated that it could take a month or more to cap the well.

The damage caused by this untimely sinking will extend far beyond wreaking havoc on the wildlife – the real importance is that it hands the luddites and enviro-fanatics just the ammunition they need to stick a brick wall in front of the baby steps underway for expanded offshore drilling. It is the equivalent of the accident at Three Mile Island, which set the nuclear power industry back by decades.

And that means precious time lost, and a near certainty that America will find itself hostage to the oil-producing nations in the years just ahead. That, in turn, means higher and higher prices, and hundreds of billions of dollars flowing overseas. Which, in turn, means a persistently high current account deficit, adding yet more weight to the pressure building on top of the U.S. dollar.

Even if the U.S. were to adopt the equivalent of a war footing in its quest for new offshore discoveries, the size of our steady demand assures that any new finds would still be insufficient over the medium to long term. If the military’s assessment is even close to being on target – with global shortages appearing in four short years – then even the most urgent action taken today would prove woefully inadequate.

But the U.S. is not adopting anything remotely close to urgent action in the quest for new oil supplies. Quite the opposite. The administration and its well-meaning but ill-advised allies are advancing legislation to hinder and penalize virtually all the base-load power providers. And thanks to the poorly timed sinking of the Deepwater Horizon rig, the opponents of “dirty” energy have been provided with a powerful weapon to be used in challenging all new offshore drilling initiatives.

How to play it? First and foremost, you’ll need to be patient. Oil prices aren’t going to skyrocket overnight, and the base-load power industries – oil, coal, gas, and nuclear – will still have to struggle through the coming onslaught of politically motivated regulatory hamstringing. Between now and the time that the depth of the nation’s energy problem becomes apparent to all, the energy sector will remain volatile.

The time to begin buying is when new legislation, coupled with a next leg down in the broader economy and markets, results in an across-the-board sell-off in the energy sector. That will be the time to get serious about building your energy portfolio. Between now and then, your goal should be to learn as much as you can about this critical sector.

And don’t forget to include the oil services sector in your studies. That sector could be the poster child for “feast or famine.” While the sector has bounced off its 2009 bottom, as the inevitable scramble for new offshore discoveries begins, the better-run companies will reward patient investors with multiples.

But first, thanks in no small part to the sinking of the Deepwater Horizon rig, the U.S. will take several steps back – away from anything that looks like energy security.

The single best way to stay closely in touch with energy and the many opportunities to profit available is with a subscription to Casey’s Energy Report, headed up by the hard-charging Marin Katusa in close collaboration with Dr. Marc Bustin, arguably one of North America’s top unconventional oil and gas experts. It is no coincidence that of 19 stocks Marin recently picked, 19 were winners… a 100% success rate. Click here for more.

Ed. note: I am a Casey Affiliate and an Energy Report subscriber - the publication is excellent, and a really great value.

Wednesday, September 02, 2009

Why Commodity Stock ETFs and Outperforming Pure Commodity ETFs

In a word: contango.

Hard Asset Investor's Brad Zigler does a great job of diving into the topic of commodity stocks edging out the futures themselves. A quick, insightful read.

Friday, July 24, 2009

What's the Deal With Natural Gas - Is It Cheap, or Not?

It seems like these days, EVERYONE is looking a natural gas prices, wondering "how could they be so low?" As recently as a few years ago, "The Natty" was selling for over $16 - how could it now be languishing just above 3?

It's often said in the commodity world that the best cure for high prices is high prices. That's exactly what's happened in the natural gas market, as North America's "peak natural gas" situation has been reversed by the miracles of innovation.

The free market solving our energy needs - what a novel idea, huh!

So if the cure for high prices is high prices, is the reverse also true? Is natural gas destined to bounce back, as suppliers inevitably turn off production that is no longer profitable. Read on to find out in this excellent piece, shared with us by noted guest author David Galland...

***

Is Natural Gas Cheap?
By David Galland, Casey Research

At the height of its late 2005 rally, natural gas in the U.S. was selling for just over $16/MMBtu, 350% higher than today’s price of $3.56. The oil/gas ratio, now over 18, is an all-time high… suggesting that natural gas is dirt cheap. So, it’s a buy, right?

In a phrase, not exactly.

According to a recent report by Natural Gas Intelligence, U.S. natural gas available for production “has jumped 58% in the past four years, driven by improved drilling techniques and the discovery of huge shale fields in Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas and Pennsylvania, according to a report issued Thursday by the nonprofit Potential Gas Committee (PGC).”

According to the report, the increase in gas discoveries and production improvements means that North America shouldn’t have to be concerned about gas supplies for up to 100 years!

Dr. Marc Bustin provided an overview of the situation in the May edition of Casey Energy Opportunities.

***

In the United States, the tremendous growth in natural gas resources and estimated recoverable natural gas, particularly from gas shales, just in the last two years (Figure 1) is sending tremors through the entire industry. These tremors include the risk of making obsolete the proposed $26 billion Alaskan and $16 billion northern Canadian pipelines to tap northern gas resources and a slue of proposed LNG terminals... unless they are for export!

The numbers currently kicked around are that something around 2,000 trillion cubic feet of gas are technically recoverable in the United States. At current production rates, this supply would last about 90 years.

Some analysts are predicting that even if the U.S. economy recovers in the next year, the amount of gas discovered to date in gas shales will severely dampen any increase in gas price for some time. According to a new study by energy consulting firm CERA (Cambridge Energy Research Associates), new technologies for unconventional gas fields are being applied so successfully that supply is essentially no longer a driver in either production or price in the North American gas market – whatever the market wants, North American gas fields can supply. CERA reports that natural gas production in the Lower 48 states has risen a startling 14% from 2007 to 2008, for example.


Major shale areas or formations in the U.S. and the estimated recoverable natural gas in 2006 and 2008. Modified from Daily Oil Bulletin (May 4, 2009).

Given the increase in production and the small slide in demand, the price of natural gas has fallen to around $3.50-$4.00 per MMBtu (down from $13 per MMBtu last summer). At these prices, many gas prospects are uneconomic, and thus there has been a marked decline in the number of wells being drilled. Rig activity (how many rigs are operating) is down about 50% in North America.

But here is where an interesting feedback mechanism kicks in. One of the characteristics of unconventional shale gas wells, and to a lesser extent natural gas wells in general, is that the production rate declines through time. Most shale wells’ production rates decline 60 to 90% in the first year. If you were a gas company trying to survive amidst today's low prices, the rate of return on your capital investment would also be painfully low for a significant amount of gas if this were your initial year of production.

Another complementary fact is that over 50% of natural gas consumed in the United States today is from wells drilled less than three years ago, and 25-30% of the gas produced today comes from wells drilled last year (Figure 2).

Hence it follows that if there are 50% fewer wells drilled this year (from the drop in rig activity), new production will decline about 35-40% by the end of the year, so there will be gas shortages. Those will in turn lead to higher North American prices, which in turn should lead to additional drilling.

Historical gas production in the U.S. showing the percentage of production from vintage of well (modified from Chesapeake April 2009 Investor presentation from original data of HIS Energy)

Everything else being equal (which it's not, this being the real, not the mathematical world), gas prices and drilling will see-saw until an equilibrium is reached. In detail, of course, things are more complicated, but it is pretty clear that gas prices will have to rise within the year, and the big losers will remain the more expensive plays that require higher gas prices to be economic.

Where will the gas price end up in the short term? A poll of analysts by Reuters suggests $6 MMBtu in 2010 (Daily Oil Bulletin, May 4, 2009), but I don’t think I would bet on a gas price based on a vote by analysts. At the same time, it's an interesting coincidence (or not – coincidence, that is) that many prospects become economic at around the $6 MMBtu range. Among them are the Haynesville and Marcellus shales – and it's no large leap from there to see their tremendous gas production potential acting as a buffer to gas prices going much higher in the near term.

***

Thus, while there may be some seasonal and relatively short-term trading opportunities in natural gas, the overhang of ready supply places a fairly firm cap on the price. Which begs the question, which big-trend energy opportunities should be getting our attention today?

Marin Katusa, who heads the Casey Research energy team, answers the question by, correctly, cataloging the opportunities according to geography.

In North America:
  1. Geothermal -- the most interesting of the alternative energy sources, by a wide margin.
  2. Nuclear.
  3. Oil.

In Europe:
  1. Unconventional gas has, by far, the most upside.
  2. Unconventional oil.
  3. Small hydro (such as run of river).

In Africa:

First and foremost, you want to avoid infrastructure plays (pipelines, refineries, etc). Then you want to look for areas with huge oil potential, which have been held off the market by concerns over political risk. I like what Lukas Lundin is doing in Ethiopia, Somalia, and Kenya, hunting for “elephants” with the idea of eventually selling the discoveries off to the Chinese.

In Asia:
  1. Liquid Natural Gas (LNG)
  2. Coal Bed Methane (CBM)

Lessons to Learn

There are a couple of useful lessons to be derived by investors looking to tap into the virtually unlimited opportunities in energy.

First, just because something is “cheap” doesn’t mean it can’t stay cheap, regardless of historical ratios -- if there has been a fundamental shift in the supply/demand equation. Which is very much the case with North American natural gas.

Secondly, geological and transport considerations make much of the energy complex a “local” market.

For example, while North America enjoys an abundance of natural gas, Europe is forced to rely on the heavy-handed Russians for the bulk of supplies. As you read this, there are companies looking to break the Russian grip by applying the same unconventional gas technologies that have so successfully built gas supplies in the U.S. -- technologies that are only just now being applied in Europe. Early investors could reap huge profits.

In short, the real opportunities are not found by simply “investing in energy” but rather by taking the time to understand the structural differences within the energy complex and cherry picking the special situations that invariably exist in a sector this large.

David Galland is the managing director of Casey Research, LLC., a private research firm providing independent analysis and investment recommendations to individual and institutional investors in North America and over 100 other countries around the globe. To learn more about the monthly Casey Energy Opportunities advisory, including a special three-month, fully guaranteed trial subscription, click here now.

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Centrally Planned Entrepreneurship, More Anecdotal Deflation

On Thursday, I gave a pitch for my startup (Chrometa, auto time capture) at a business innovation showcase here in Sacramento.

A traditional business plan pitch is fairly formulaic - you talk about the pain point you're addressing, your solution, your market, why your team can get it done, etc. Big focus on the market in something like this - how big is it, how can you reach and sell to it.

What really struck and nauseated me on Thursday were the number of companies that talked about their alignment with current government initiatives. At least half. One presentation even had a head shot and quote from Obama about his push for green energy or some crap like that.

I'm not knocking the entrepreneurs...they can run their companies how they choose. What bothers me is the free market taking a back seat to centrally planned government initiatives.

Why not build a product that people or businesses want and sell it to them? That is SO 20th century. This day in age, you pick out an important federal initiative - green, clean, healthcare, etc - and step on up to the trough of stimulus hand outs.

Dear reader, this is not healthy economic behavior. This, I'd imagine, is how you'd run a startup in the old Soviet Union.

This is not the first time, of course, that I've noticed this pandering going on in startup circles - which are traditionally more or less bastions of pure capitalism - but this is the most extreme I've seen it to date. Seems like everyone wants to get their hands on stimulus funds or grants.

When in Rome, I guess...or maybe when in Moscow.

Bulls who are waiting for small businesses to innovate and lead us out of the recession may be waiting longer than usual. There's a lot of effort being wasted in chasing these centrally planned initiatives.


Is This Blog the Ultimate Contrarian Indicator?

To say that I was wiping the egg off my face this week after this bearish post from last Sunday would be an understatement. Lately I have been forecasting less often, as I try to weigh different positions, and ultimately use the charts to see if they support a hypothesis. Perhaps you should take my forecasts and start trading against them!

For what it's worth, I do remain bearish on nearly everything in the medium term here. We still have not seen commodities decouple from stocks and currencies - hence if you believe the market is ultimately heading lower, than caution should also be exercised when looking at these other markets as well.

Uncorrelated markets suddenly traded in perfect harmony when the Great Deleveraging hit - and if we see another bout of it, I can't see a reason why anything will be spared, at least in the short term.

Yes, people will still need to eat, and we'll keep an eye on the food complex in particular - but caution is still the order of the day for me.


More Anecdotal Deflation

Our office in downtown Sacramento gives us a bird's eye view of the continuing unfolding
disaster here in the People's Republic of California. It is fascinating, amusing, and sad, all at the same time.

While intriguing to see a socialist experiment blow up right before my very eyes, with helpless government officials continuing to turn a bad situation worse, there are real people and businesses affected, which is not so cool...at least in the short term.

The state recently added a 3rd furlough day - so state workers now have been handed a forced 15% pay cut, in return for 3 Fridays off a month. Most would not make that trade if given the choice themselves.

The effects on the city economy are very real. Shop owners and employees I've spoken with on "Furlough Fridays" are bummed out - the coffee shop guy next door to my office described yesterday morning as "very slow". My favorite tea shop in town has also experienced a notable drop off on Fridays - half of their customers are state workers, the owner told me.

This is deflation, no doubt about it. Wages are cut. Businesses are hit. They keep prices steady or lower then to lure in bargain shoppers, who have less money to spend.

In a case like the one I'm seeing unwind right before my eyes, the inflation scenario sounds like an academic exercise.

While the state goverment has its hands tied, because it cannot print money, the Federal government is the only entity that could reverse this trend. I suppose if they printed money, restored workers full pay, and made up the different with the newly minted currency, that would eventually be inflationary.

That's the only way I can see the Fed getting this new money into the system. Banks will not lend it, and that doesn't seem likely to change anytime soon. Only public works projects that are paid with newly minted money seem like the only option.

Still, can they print it fast enough to stave off the credit deflation we're seeing left and right? I'm starting to think not.


Quick Reader Survey - Please Share Your Thoughs!

I tossed together a quick 3-question reader survey, and I'd appreciate it if you could take a minute or two to share your thoughts and suggestions with me using the survey link here.

It's always great to connect with you, and your feedback and input help me figure out where to focus my energies...namely on stuff you like, and stuff you'd like to see more of.



Positions Update

Still scared...


Current Account Value: $27,511.18

Cashed out: $20,000.00
Total value: $47,511.18
Weekly return: 0%
2009 YTD return: -45.8% :(

Prior year's results: --> Don't try this at home...this is what is known as wreckless trading
2008: -8%
2007: 175%
2006: 60%
2005: 805%

Initial stake: $2,000.00

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Sugar Shines on Manic Tuesday, Nears a 3-Year High


It's been a manic start to the week for commodities and currencies...deflation was "back" yesterday, with investors running back to the dollar...and today inflation was the focus, with the dollar getting dumped!

Last evening, we observed that sugar was standing tall amidst an across the board selloff in commodities. Well today, that strength carried through in a big way - with sugar up nearly a full cent on the day!

July sugar futures closed the day a shade under 16-cents, which was exceeded briefly this April and May. The October contract closed near 17-cents, a high on the year. If this jump holds, we'll be looking at picking up an October sugar contract on this mega-breakout.

Sugar me sweet, baby. (Source: Barchart.com)

What are the fundamentals driving this? The supply/demand deficit that has been on the radar screen since earlier in the year.

Caution is warranted, though, as a pullback in oil could send some of the hot money to the exits just as fast as it appears to be pouring into sugar. But for now, the market seems to be telling us that the sugar bull is back!

Monday, June 22, 2009

Turn Back the Clock...It's Another "Flight to Safety" Day

Mama said there'd be days like these...though you may have thought they were a thing of the past.

With the DOW dropping 200 points on the day, and commodities down across the board, the "flight to safety" positions stood tall, just as they did during the darkest days of the Great Deleveraging of 2008.

Yes, sadly, the US dollar, Japanese Yen, and long-dated US Treasuries were just about the only "green shoots" on the board today. This screen shot of the currency markets says it all, from Barchart.com:


On massacre days like today, I like to peruse the boards and find the lone bright spots. So was ANYTHING else up, other than these "safety" trades?

Sugar, coffee, and the meats were the lone bright spots for commodities. Sugar seems to have some nice support around 15-cents:

Sugar appears to have some support around 15-cents (Source: Barchart.com).

While coffee and cattle have been really battered of late. Coffee may be trying to find a bottom around 117, while cattle also looks like it's finding some support. Take a look at the long term chart for live cattle...with prices at their lowest levels since 2006, this could be a compelling time to take a look at loading up on some beef:


Cattle may be finding a bottom after a rough past year (Source: Barchart.com).

Monday, June 15, 2009

Why China May Soon Halt Commodity Purchases

Apparently, most of China's recent purchases on the commodity markets have been to build up stockpiles, rather than satisfy actual demand - according to The Daily Crux.

That means the huge Chinese buying is unlikely to continue, and that in turn means commodity prices may be unable to sustain their recent advance.

As for the stockpiling, at least 90 freighters stuffed with iron ore that are floating at China’s ports will have to wait as much as two weeks to unload their cargo because port storage facilities are full...

If this is the case...we sure could be in for a violent pullback in the near term.

Personally, I sold all of my soybean positions today - I was too scared to stay long, and I'm also too frightened to go short. So for now I'll bide time in cash - US dollars of all things!

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Stocks Down Today...So What Commodities Did Well?

Regular readers know that we've been anxiously awaiting the decoupling of commodities and currencies from stocks.  These asset classes are historically uncorrelated.  That changed late last year when the financial world ended, and everything went down the crapper at about the same speed.

Except, of course, the US dollar and bonds...but I digress...

Today stocks were down...the DOW dropped about 100.  These are the days I love to watch...so we can pick out the notable performers.  

Good performances from today...
  • Gold...up $13.80 to close at $951
  • Silver...up $0.16 to close at $14.44
  • Coffee...up 2.50 to close at 135.80
  • Sugar...up 0.24 to close at 15.62 (this is why you never take profits, like I recently did, to wait for a pullback...it may never pullback, and you lose your position)
  • Soybeans...up 6 to close at 1175
The dollar got hit today...long dated US Treasuries got slammed BIG...makes you wonder if we're starting to see a return to fundamentals.

Gold and silver look like they could be gearing up for some big moves.  Sell in May and go away?  Maybe not quite yet.

Also, it's nice to see sugar up on a day when oil was down.  It was dumb of me to give up that position...

Monday, May 11, 2009

Free Commodity Webcast From US Global Investors

Here's a fantastic - and free - webcast, courtesy of Frank Holmes and the team at US Global Investors, entitled Commodities: Reasons to Be a Bull When Everyone's a Bear.  It was originally recorded on April 21st.

It runs almost an hour, and is definitely worth a watch if you are a serious commodities investor.  These guys really know their commodes.  Some notes I took of the most interesting/surprising points I heard:
  • It usually takes 6-9 months for new money injected into the system to find its way into commodities...this is starting to happen already, and they expect a big 2nd half for commodities
  • Nice profile of China starting around minute 25...they think the Chinese economy is ready to rock and roll here
  • And China's now a net importer of coal once again

A Breakdown of Commodity ETF Options

Brad Zigler, Managing Editor of Hard Assets Investor, recently did a great breakdown of commodity focused ETF options for investors.

This is a question we get quite often - "How can I invest in commodities without opening up a futures account?"  

If you're looking for commodity investment options from the comfort of your stock brokerage account, you'll enjoy Brad's piece.

Sunday, May 03, 2009

Soft Commodities are Starting to Scream: "Inflation!"

Milton Friedman said that inflation is "always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon."  Judging by the recent price action in many of the soft and agricultural commodities, they appear to agree.

Ben Bernanke, a student of the Great Depression, is making a bet the Friedman was wrong.  Bernanke believes that because Friedman did much of his work during a period of time when the velocity of money was relatively constant, he did not properly account for this factor in determining inflation.

Helicopter Ben is conducting this "Great Experiment" of money printing to stave off a Depression based on the monetary theory developed by economist Irving Fisher, who believed the Depression occurred because money velocity dropped off a cliff, and there was no increase in money supply to counter this.  Thus the US slipped into a deflationary spiral.

This is the big question - when the velocity of money drops, as it is today, should the money supply be increased?  Who's right - Fisher or Friedman?

We don't yet know - though, as always, the market will decide the winners and losers.  And lately it's hard not to notice what the commodity markets have been telling us, especially agriculture.

First, let's see Exhibit A - the adjusted monetary base of the US, which still appears to be in a "bull market":

Many of us saw the initial spike and immediately yelled "Inflation!"  We loaded up and gold and ran for the hills.  And what happened?  The spike in monetary growth continued to grow to the sky, and gold got slammed - along with almost every other asset class.  (Save the US Dollar and US Treasuries - hats off if you had that trade, as you are a true "contrarian's contrarian"!)

Fast forward to a few weeks ago, and we noticed that not only had commodities appeared to have formed a bottom, but they were starting to climb.

This week, we saw a full fledged break out in the softs and the grains - let's quickly have a look at three of our current favorites.

Sugar futures - our old favorite - rallied over 5% this week, to close a shade under 15-cents.  Sugar's been on a steady climb - fundamentals look quite appealing, as we discussed last week, and there's no arguing with this chart:


Cotton futures continued their strong rally, breaking right past the low 50's resistance we were keeping an eye on:


Finally take a look at Soybeans!  This rally was kicked off when soybean acreage came in below expectations, and it's been off to the races ever since:


So which will it be, inflation or deflation?  Don't get too hung up in economic theory - remember that the markets are always right.  And right now, these markets, buoyed as well by strong fundamentals, appear to be casting an emphatic vote for inflation!
 

Top Commodity and Economic News...

Current Futures Positions

Nothing new...unfortunately!  I thought about adding to the sugar position on Thursday - and I should have!  Will seriously look at adding another contract tomorrow or Tuesday on continued strength.

Date Position Qty Month/Yr Contract Entry Last Profit
04/08/09  Long  1 JUL 09 Orange Juice 81.95 85.10 $472.50
04/20/09  Long  1 JUL 09  Sugar #11     13.79  14.91$1,713.60

Net Profit/Loss On Open Positions $2,186.10

Current Account Value: $26,920.49

Cashed out: $20,000.00
Total value: $46,920.49
Weekly return: 3.5%
2009 YTD return: -47.0% (Don't call it a comeback!)

Prior year's results:
2008: -8%
2007: 175%
2006: 60%
2005: 805%

Initial stake: $2,000.00

Editor's Note: This article was also published by SeekingAlpha.com.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Sugar Futures Rally, OJ Takes a Breather - This Week In Commodities

Sugar Futures Surge to a 6-Month High

Sugar futures rallied nearly 4% on Friday, over half a cent, to close the week at 14.18.  Looks like we've got a new breakout to the upside!

Sugar futures continue their steady climb.  (Source: Barchart.com)

The market continued to focus on the news that India may turn into a net importer of sugar this year.  Indian production is falling to a 4-year low, which, surprise surprise, is spurring prices up.  Don't worry though, Indian politicians are on the scene, with rhetoric and threats of banning futures trading to "halt" this price rise - ha!  

Also bullish for sugar is continued strength in oil prices, which means Brazil will use more of its sugar for fuel.  Last report I recall reading had Brazilian ethanol profitable at roughly $50 oil, so that's the number I keep an eye on.

Finally demand for sugar is still projected to outpace supply this year, so we've got some strong underpinnings for a sustained rise in sugar in the months to come.  


OJ Takes a Breather

Orange juice futures took a bit of a breather this week.  Appears to be just a technical correction and profit taking, as I was not able to find any fundamental news to challenge our initial hypothesis for going long OJ.

Orange juice cooled off this week.

Other Commodity and Economic News

Current Futures Positions

Rolled the May contract over to July earlier in the week.  Other than that, not much new. 

Thinking about adding to OJ, sugar positions on further strength.

Date Position Qty Month/Yr Contract Entry Last Profit
04/08/09  Long  1 JUL 09 Orange Juice 81.95 85.00 $457.50
02/27/09  Long  1 JUL 09  Sugar #11     13.79  14.12 ($672.00)

Net Profit/Loss On Open Positions $1,286.30

Current Account Value: $26,020.69

Cashed out: $20,000.00
Total value: $46,020.69
Weekly return: 0.1%
2009 YTD return: -48.8% (Don't call it a comeback!)

Prior year's results:
2008: -8%
2007: 175%
2006: 60%
2005: 805%

Initial stake: $2,000.00

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Is Natural Gas As Low As It Can Go?

May Natural Gas futures currently sit a shade above $3.50 - their lowest point since 2002!  Check out this chart...can you spot the trend?

Source: BarChart.com

Jeff Clark writes that $3.50 is widely regarded as the "shut in" price for natural gas - the price where drillers are better off closing the well than continuing to operate it.

When the price of a commodity drops below the cost of production, that is music to our ears.  After all, the best cure for low prices is low prices.  Keep an eye on the natty, because something has to give, sooner or later.

Looking for an easy way to invest in natural gas?  Check out UNG, a fund that tracks the price of the natty - it's a simple way to speculate on natural gas prices from the comfort of your stock trading account.

Monday, March 23, 2009

Comparison With Last Commodity Bull Market

This chart overlays our current bull market in commodities with the previous one.  If history is any indication, we could have a ways to go here.


Courtesy: Agora Financial

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Weekly Commodities Report - Dropping Dollars From Helicopters

Bernanke Fires Up the Printing Presses

Earlier this week, Ben Bernanke announced the US Federal Reserve will buy up to $300 billion of US long-term Treasury securities over the next 3 months.  Where will the Fed get that money?  It will essentially create it out of thin air - also known as "printing money."


Surprisingly, the markets were not amused by Ben's announcement, as the dollar suffered it's largest one-day decline since 1971, while gold got a nice pop, rallying from sub $900, currently sitting around $950 as I type.  

Gold's recent rally may have had something to do with the fact that it, unlike the US Dollar, cannot be created out of thin air.

Amusingly, this accouncement comes on the heels of a key Chinese official lamenting the bad stench emanating from US Treasury Bonds.  Some reports I've seen recently suggest that foreign investment in US debt has fallen precipitiously, and this represents the Fed's last gasp to hold interest rates low - possibly attempting to drive them all the way down to zero.

If you've been thinking that deflation would rule the day, I'd highly recommend revisiting an important guest piece penned for us by Bud Conrad about this epic battle between inflation and deflation.


If You're Short the Yen, You're Long the Dollar - Oops

The past couple weeks I've been on my soap box, calling the demise of the Japanese Yen.  I made the case that the Yen was circling the toilet bowl at a faster rate than the US Dollar.

Oops.

The Yen spiked sharply, and unfortunately I was stopped out of my short position at a large loss.  After I was stopped out, then Yen continued to rise a bit, and has since corrected back down.


This is why my wife yells at me for trading currencies.

Ah well, sucks, but have to respect your stops.

I have to admit, this trade gone awry may have killed my appetite for currency trading for awhile.  It was easy when the dollar was on a one-way trajectory to the cellar.  

Things are just a bit too crazy in the currency markets right now for an armchair trader like me to figure out.


Depression Economics for Kids

And just when you thought things couldn't get any stranger in the financial world, Disney announces a new exhibit at EPCOT center called "The Great Piggy Bank Adventure".

The exhibit will teach kids such valuable life lessons as staying ahead of inflation, and diversifying your investments.  

You can't make this stuff up.


Current Futures Positions

Date Position Qty Month/Yr Contract Entry Last Profit
02/27/09 Long  MAY 09  Sugar #11  13.79  13.42  ($414.40) 

Net Profit/Loss On Open Positions ($414.40)

Current Account Value: $25,312.72

Cashed out: $20,000.00
Total value: $45,312.72
Weekly return: -12.7%
2009 YTD return: -50.2% (yikes)

Prior year's results:
2008: -8%
2007: 175%
2006: 60%
2005: 805%

Initial stake: $2,000.00

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Corn Rallies on Short Covering, Technicals

I thought it was something Komrade Obama said last night, but apparently corn's rally today was due to short covering and buy orders that kicked in on the rally.

According to my broker, corn still sits about $.50 below the cost of production. I've read that for the most part, most grains and softs are currently sitting either below or just at their respective costs of production.

Reading this article reminded me that I completely forgot to roll my 2 March corn contracts - a couple more days and we might have seen a big old truck from Iowa pulling up at my doorstep to drop off a special delivery. Boy the wife would have loved that one.

So I just rolled them, but only picked up 1 May.

CBOT Corn Review: Surges; Short-Covering, Spread Unwinding

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Jim Rogers' Latest Comments: February 13, 2009

Jim Rogers' latest comments - February 13, 2009.
  • US stimulus packages are throwing "good money after bad"
  • US making the same mistakes as Japan, propping up zombie companies and supporting the incompetent people
  • Financial mess started with the bailout of Long Term Capital Management in 1998
  • Alan Greenspan never let the system work, as he did not let anyone fail
  • Water treatment, agriculture good places to be for the foreseeable future
  • Does not see a great future for the Pound Sterling
  • Has zero respect for the World Bank and the IMF - we should abolish them

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Commodity Futures Weekly Review - January 11, 2009


Now for the weekly review of our commodity futures positions - current as of January 11, 2009.

First, our top blog posts from the past week:
Also our coverage of Jim Rogers' and Marc Faber's Commodity Picks for 2009 was the 2nd most popular article on Seeking Alpha for much of the week.

A review of our trades and positions from the previous week:
  • Sold our mini-gold futures contract - to make way for another grains contract. This was a position sizing move - gold had not yet hit our sell stop.
  • Also sold our one cocoa futures contract - also for position sizing purposes. Cocoa was not performing as well as wheat, so we decided to add to our wheat position.
  • Bought one more wheat futures contract - wheat put in a strong performance this week, up $0.20.

  • Continued to hold one corn futures contract. This was an attempt to "pyramid" our grains position and diversify. Corn was up $0.02 on the week.


  • And finally, the dunce cap so far goes on our decision to eat our own dog food and short the 10-Year Treasury Note. We haven't lost hope yet, but will have to exit this position if new highs are hit. It won't be the first time we've gotten burned on this trade.


Commodities that appear quite beaten down - but we don't own them...yet...
  • Sugar
  • Coffee
  • Natural Gas
  • Silver
  • Crude Oil

Open positions

Date Position Qty Month/Yr Contract Entry Price Last Price Profit/Loss
12/29/08 Long 1 MAR 09 Corn 422 1/4 412 ($512.50)
12/31/08 Long 1 MAR 09 Cotton 48.52 49.33 $405.00
01/06/09 Short 1 MAR 09 T-Note (10yr) 123-285 125-220 ($1,796.88)
12/24/08 Long 1 MAR 09 Wheat 579 1/4 630 $2,537.50
01/06/09 Long 1 MAR 09 Wheat 627 3/4 630 $112.50
Net Profit/Loss On Open Positions $745.63

Account Balances

Current Cash Balance $47,783.90
Open Trade Equity $745.63
Total Equity $48,529.53
Long Option Value $0.00
Short Option Value $0.00
Net Liquidating Value $48,529.53
---------------------------------------------
Cashed out: $20,000.00
Total value: $68,529.53
Weekly return: -2.1%
2009 YTD return: -4.5%

2008 return: -8%

***"Cash out" mostly means taxes - lately we've also been using it for living expenses, and also to finance our time management software company that was recently covered by the Sacramento Business Journal and Inc magazine.

Sunday, January 04, 2009

Commodity Futures Review - January 4, 2009



Now for the weekly review of our commodity futures positions - current as of January 4, 2009.

First, our top blog posts from the past week:

Our coverage of Marc Faber's recent interview on CNBC from December 1st continues to see a lot of traffic.

A review of our trades and positions from the previous week:
  • Continued to hold one cocoa futures contract - down on the week, mostly due to a sharp Friday drop.

  • Continued to hold one mini-gold futures contract. Gold was stuck in the mud for the week - though it did wrap up an 8th consecutive up year vs. the US dollar.

  • Continued to hold one wheat futures contract - up a bit for the week. Looking to add on further strength.

  • Bought one corn futures contract. This was an attempt to "pyramid" our grains position and diversify - in hindsight, looking at the charts of each, wheat looks stronger, and we should have added to that position before initiating this one.



Commodities that appear quite beaten down - but we don't own them...yet...
  • Sugar
  • Coffee
  • Natural Gas
  • Silver
  • Crude Oil

Open positions

Date Position Qty Month/Yr Contract Entry Price Last Price Profit/Loss
12/29/08 Long 1 MAR 09 Corn 422 1/4 410 ($612.50)
12/15/08 Long 1 MAR 09 Cocoa 2586 2506 ($800.00)
12/31/08 Long 1 MAR 09 Cotton 48.52 48.90 $190.00
12/24/08 Long 1 MAR 09 Wheat 579 1/4 610 $1,537.50
12/15/08 Long 1 FEB 09 Mini Gold 836.6 877.3 $1,351.24
Net Profit/Loss On Open Positions $1,666.24

Account Balances

Current Cash Balance $47,887.81
Open Trade Equity $1,666.24
Total Equity $49,554.05
Long Option Value $0.00
Short Option Value $0.00
Net Liquidating Value $49,554.05

---------------------------------------------
Cashed out: $20,000.00
Total value: $69,554.05
Weekly return: -2.5% *** since 1/1/09
YTD return: -2.5%

2008 return: -8%

***"Cash out" mostly means taxes, but lately we've also been using it for living expenses, and also to finance a cool new time management software startup that is starting to lift off - and was recently covered by the Sacramento Business Journal.

Most Popular Articles This Month