Demographics are Screaming "Deflationary Depression!" Here's Why...

This week I caught another fascinating interview on the Financial Sense Newshour - with Harry S. Dent, author of The Great Depression Ahead.

OK, so what's so insightful about a guy publishing a next Great Depression in 2009? Well when it comes from the same guy that published The Great Boom Ahead in 1992, I definitely give his depression calls some credence!

I love guys who can call booms and busts. There aren't many of them. Most investment analysts seem to have a bullish or bearish slant that, ultimately, sways their outlook.

Harry S. Dent seems to be pretty even keel. He made the case in '92, and again earlier this decade, that the US boom would last longer, and go much farther, than anyone would anticipate. Why? Demographics.

By studying America's demographics, Dent concluded that baby boomers would keep on spending, and driving the economy, until the latter part of this decade. I recall reading an article by him in 2004, where he made the case that the boom was going to last for at least a few more years. I thought the guy was nuts at the time! I was still waiting for the '00-'02 correction to continue.

Well, Dent called it. And now he's turning bearish. He sees a lot of dark clouds coming together at the same time, as the US descends into what he deems will be a long "economic winter."

Japan, Dent says, suffered the same fate. Japan's 1990 was our 2007, he says. That's when the demographic worm turned for the Japanese, as they sank into their long, extended deflationary depression.

What a lovely older couple. Unfortunately for the US, we'll soon have too many of them to keep our economy humming - according to Harry S. Dent.

In his interview with Puplava, Dent makes a very strong case for deflation ruling the day. According to him, inflation and deflation alternate in cycles that are strongly driven by demographics. So first deflation takes hold, then decelerates, then inflation grabs hold, decelerates, and the cycle starts anew.

In other words, he's not expecting a repeat of the 1970's, but instead, the 1930's. Interestingly I've heard this from other market observers as well - some folks favor the 80-year megacycle.

The conversation was fascinating, and I'd highly recommend you give it a listen at least once. He's going to be re-releasing his book later this year, so stay tuned, as we can reconvene to discuss it after it's out. I'm looking forward to hearing his latest thoughts.

Here's the link to the interview: http://www.financialsense.com/Experts/2009/Dent.html

Gauging Investor Sentiment With the WSJ

My article last week, about using the Wall Street Journal to gauge investor sentiment, was republished by Seeking Alpha. It collected quite the stream of comments - some very astute, and some pretty dumb. Here's the link to the article and comments:

http://seekingalpha.com/article/163602-using-the-wall-street-journal-to-gauge-investor-sentiment

I plan to continue to work sentiment indicators into our discussion more and more. Because I find them fascinating, and also because I believe I made my biggest investing/trading mistakes when I was trading euphorically with the herd, rather than against it.

Your feedback and comments are always very much appreciated.

Most Popular Posts Last Week

• Using the Wall Street Journal to Gauge Investor Sentiment

• Links to Two More (Excellent) Marc Faber Interviews

• Who's Buying Oil Today? The Answer May Surprise You

Positions Update - Still Long the Buck

The dollar continues to see strong support at these levels, while sentiment appears to still be quite negative. It's a good sign when an asset goes up, despite continued "bad" fundamental news.

Sure, the dollar may indeed be a doomed currency - eventually. But you're not going to make any money on that trade as long as everyone else believes it too!

Reports of the dollar's demise have, until now, been greatly exaggerated.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Open positions:

Thanks for reading!

Current Account Value: $25,479.83

Cashed out: $20,000.00
Total value: $45,479.83
Weekly return: 1.0%
2009 YTD return: -49.8% (Yikes!)

Prior yearly returns:
2008: -8%
2007: 175%
2006: 60%
2005: 805%

Initial trading stake: $2,000.00

So Long, Cotton...I'm Just Too Wary of Deflation

I have to admit - I think the Great Deleveraging permanently seared my psyche. I haven't been the same since.

It's for the best. Until you live, and invest, through an event like that, I don't think you can appreciate the awesomeness of the destruction. A history book just doesn't do it justice.

When it came time to roll my cotton position last Friday, I reflected on whether or not I wanted to keep the position. That's one nice thing about trading futures - when it's time to roll, you have a check point of sorts that forces you to reflect, even if for only a second.

My plan with cotton has been to hold as long as it stays above it's lower resistance points (which is has...but just barely), and sell if I was fortunate enough to see it hit its upper resistance.

Well, I got lucky and cotton broke $0.62 - and with some serious resistance here, I was happy to sell my position.

Cotton has been doing the range trading thing.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Why not wait for a potential breakout? After all, cotton has traded north of 90 cents in the past two years - perhaps a decisive break above 63 could send it on a moonshot?

Perhaps. But like I mentioned before, I'm still gunshy. I fear that the deflation monster is still lurking in the shadows. Last time I stayed stubbornly long - big mistake. I hope that next time, I can at least make a new set of mistakes, rather than repeating the same old ones!

Remember what happened last time deflation took hold of the markets - it took hold of all of them. All assets traded together - correlation went to 1. So much for diversification...it doesn't really help to have your eggs in a few different baskets when ALL of the baskets hit the ground, and ALL of the eggs crack in half!

I guess I can't see why things would be different if we see another wave of deleveraging. The dollar would rally. Treasuries may as well. And everything else would get slammed.

At the very least, I think we're due for a correction in most assets. Optimism is quite high on, well, just about everything. Gold is everyone's darling, stocks are in the midst of a rally for the ages, and the Fed is being heralded as the saviors of the financial universe.

I'm just not completely sold on this story, at least just yet.

So, for the meantime, I'll be mostly in cash. And that means even a commodity with favorable fundamentals - such as cotton - is something I'll be casting a skeptical eye on at these prices.

Popular Posts for the Week Ahead

In case you missed them - here are the most popular posts from the past week:

• Natural Gas - In a Death Spiral?

• A Great Inflation Debate: Prechter vs. Puplava

• Marc Faber: There's Too Much Enthusiasm for Gold Right Now (Free Audio)

Positions Update - Still Like the Buck

We bid cotton a farewell, at least for now. My favorite trade is still the US dollar - I think it's due for a massive rally, at least in the short to medium term, if for no other reason than the fact that absolute everyone is bearish on the buck.

I outlined my hypothesis for going long the buck a few weeks ago, and I don't think the story has changed. Sentiment still appears to be overwhelmingly negative, and I am still not (yet) a believer in the inflation story.

If the facts appear to change - or, more importantly, if the chart proves me wrong - I'll definitely reevaluate this position.

The dollar still sits well above its 2007 lows - at least for now.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Open positions:

Thanks for reading!

Current Account Value: $25,119.83

Cashed out: $20,000.00
Total value: $45,119.83
Weekly return: 6.6%
2009 YTD return: -50.6% (Yikes!)

Prior yearly returns:
2008: -8%
2007: 175%
2006: 60%
2005: 805%

Initial trading stake: $2,000

Holding Gold and Cash, Nonconfirming Indicators, and Cheap(er) Toilet Paper

On Tuesday evening, we had our monthly meeting of local Casey Research subscribers. Really sharp investment minds in the group - it's a real pleasure and treat to chat about a wide variety of finance and investing related issues.

The general consensus of the group (fairly contrarian in nature) is that gold and cash are the places to be right now. Gold because it's a store of value, not because it's going to $1,500 tomorrow. In fact, there was some trepidation that gold is due for a pullback from here. But everyone agrees that holding physical bullion is a good thing.

Short term market outlook is very cautious on the whole, to say the least. We are all expecting a pullback of sorts, and believe that if/when that happens, we could again see asset deflation across the board. So while most of us are long term believers in gold and energy plays, caution is being exercised right now.

Consumer Credit Plummets in July

I noticed a big time deflation headline on the USA Today earlier this week: Consumers Cut Outstanding Credit By Record $21.5 Billion.

As much as the Fed may be running the printing presses, it doesn't matter if the American consumer is choking on debt. Remember that shrinking credit is really the cornerstone of the deflationary hypothesis.

Because we have a credit based monetary system, credit can shrink faster than the Fed can print. At least in the short term - say the next 2-3 years. Of course, we could see inflation, or hyperinflation after that - but possibly after a huge wipe out in asset prices.

If the Fed can reinflate the credit bubble one more time, soon, then yes, all bets are off. But there doesn't seem to be any indications of this actually working - yet. Though perhaps $1,000 is an early warning signal. We shall see!

Wages Continue to Drop

Nice article by Rob Parenteau in Wednesday's Daily Reckoning about labor costs entitled Unlabor Day. I like his stuff - it's quite thorough and balanced.

According to Rob, the recession is doing it's job, and America's businesses are becoming more productive. I believe that 100%, and it's something I wrestle with when thinking about where our economy is heading. A lot of excesses are in fact being wiped out - which is exactly what should happen. Unfortunately, the government may be creating enough distortions to nullify all the positive that's happening.

Anyway back to his article - labor costs are typically an important component of inflation (or the lack thereof). It's hard to see rising prices without rising wages. Thus for now, Rob believes inflation is on hold until we see the government's inflationary actions start to take hold:

The question remains what lies ahead after the massive quantitative easing operations of the Federal Reserve have lapsed and the bulk of the fiscal stimulus is behind us. In the very near term, we can surely expect auto sales to wilt following the end of the cash for clunkers program, but we remain impressed by what supply managers in the most cyclical part of the economy, namely manufacturing, have to say about new orders, production and export conditions. Policymakers panicked and adopted a “whatever it takes” stance, one that has proven to be the most radical outside of major wartime conditions. Looks like something took – and not surprisingly, gold is taking out the $1,000 per ounce mark at the same time.

It's Even DE-flation in Toilet Paper

Procter & Gamble announced last week that it will be cutting prices across nearly 10% of its household brands. It looks like we're at least seeing deflation in laundry detergent!

That reminds me of an interesting point Bob Prechter made in the interview we linked to last week (inflation/deflation debate with Prechter and Jim Puplava - highly recommended).

When Puplava said that he didn't see prices coming down in his neighborhood, Prechter countered and said that we're seeing rising prices in a lot of sectors that have high government involvement. Like medical care - highly regulated industries. And these price increases are due to the inherent inefficiencies of government meddling, and nothing more.

In mostly privatized industries, he says we're seeing more deflation across the board. An interesting though to ponder.

If It's a New Bull Market, Who Forgot to Tell China?

It seems ominous that China, the posterchild of this rally and lone economic hope for the world, has turned south. Remember that China turned south ahead of the US markets tanking last time. Maybe they get the news faster in the Far East thanks to the time difference?

Sure China could break out from here. But I can't help but think that the five-year chart shows a classic Fibonacci retracement since March, and nothing more.

Flash Player 9 or higher is required to view the chart
Click here to download Flash Player now

View the full INDEX:SSEC chart at Wikinvest

.

Positions Update

Rolled over my dollar index position to the December contract. I love getting the Friday morning call from my broker that I need to be out of a position, haha. Haven't had that one in awhile. My wife always jokes that if I got hit by a truck, my lasting curse to her would be a delivery of cotton and soybeans to our front lawn!

Still holding these (dogs) of positions for now. I'll repeat what I said about China for cotton - if it's a new bull market, why doesn't cotton know?

Cotton continues to range trade.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Open positions:

Thanks for reading!

Current Account Value: $23,557.10

Cashed out: $20,000.00
Total value: $43,557.10
Weekly return: -3.4%
2009 YTD return: -53.6% (Yikes!)

Prior yearly returns:
2008: -8%
2007: 175%
2006: 60%
2005: 805%

Initial trading stake: $2,000

Robert Prechter and Jim Puplava: A Great Inflation / Deflation Debate (Free Audio)

I hope you had a good, long holiday weekend. I sure did...I mentioned at the end of the week that I'd be blogging when I wasn't drinking beer. As you can probably infer from my lack of posts, I managed to put back a few with some good friends!

Back in the saddle now, I listened (twice, actually) to a fantastic interview and inflation/deflation debate as Jim Puplava chatted with Robert Prechter on his Financial Sense Newshour. Here's the link to the interview: http://www.financialsense.com/fsn/main.html

Note: It's the September 5, 2009 post that you want to look for. And as a bonus, he also interviewed Neil Howe, author of The Fourth Turning! I've got that one next on my iPod, and will do a post on that afterwards.

Despite gold approaching $1,000, and the equity markets rallying north of 50% over the past few months, Prechter is holding strong to his deflationary stance. In fact, he goes as far as to say he can't see a hole in the deflationary argument!

Listening to Prechter's answers, I have to say it's real tough to poke a hole in his line of reasoning, which is always very thorough, and usually contrary to popular opinion.

Here were a few of the highlights for me:

• Prechter actually called the Fed's actions "fairly conservative" - not quite as conservative as the 30's, but conservative nonetheless.

• He believes that the Fed can do NOTHING to prevent deflation. Basically, because we have a credit bubble. And as that credit goes away to money heaven, even if the Fed were to print the money to replace it, at best that would be a wash.

• The core of his argument is that most debt outstanding will go unpaid. The lenders are carrying the value of this debt on their books at values that are not realistic. He says in 2007, the world woke up to the fact that these debts will go unpaid, triggering the onset of deflation.

• He's not at all concerned with the current rally - in fact, he predicted it (I can vouch for that - I've been a subscriber of his since the spring).

• Prechter is not quite as bearish on gold as he's been in the past. In fact, he admitted it will likely strike a new high during this move. He also now thinks that gold will hold up better than most assets, and even recommends a GoldMoney account for diversification purposes.

• He's looking at 2010 to be a huge year for deflation.

• When Puplava asked for a historical example of a fiat currency of a debtor nation that did not suffer from inflation or hyperinflation, Prechter cited four examples of credit bubbles in history, saying that everytime a credit bubble ends, it results in deflation (with Japan being the most recent example).

• Prechter posits the question: if inflation is a threat and a repeat of the 70's, why aren't interest rates at 5, 10, 15%?

• He also says that social mood has permanently turned towards a deflationary mindset. Thus, the Fed is "pushing on a string", and zero interest rates will not reinflate anything (a la Japan). (Brett note: I read a similar social mood comment about the Great Depression, that inflation "did not take" despite the Fed's best efforts, because of investor's mindsets).

I'd highly recommend you set aside an hour of your time to listen to this interview. Puplava's a super sharp investor, and also currently in the inflation camp - so he tosses a lot of good questions towards Prechter.

As you probably know, I've been in the deflationary camp for the past couple of months - though I am always rechecking my assumptions.

Side note: If you're interested in reading a recent newsletter from Prechter, they are actually giving out the July issue for free until this Wednesday - you can check that offer out here.

It really feels like this whole inflation/deflation debate is going to come to a head soon. Prechter believes the next wave down will be more powerful than the first, and also that it will be quite soon...as soon as now.

On the other side of the fence, we've got gold making a solid run at $1,000 (and I'm wiping the egg off my face right now from selling out in June). And some really sharp gurus predicting hyperinflation and insisting that the rally has been driven by printed money - as evidenced by the fact that bank stocks have led the charge, and they are usually the first to lead in inflationary wave.

Actually I find it interesting that since March, Prechter's script has been identical to that of the inflationist point of view. The inflationists say the rally is being led by the banks, which is typical. It will then spill over into other areas (gold, etc), and away we go. Prechter and his guys, on the other hand, say that this rally was due to happen, but it's a false hope, being driven by crap (banks, etc), and it's about run it's course.

So we seem to be at a fork in the road of sorts. The next turn may be the game decider! We'll stay tuned in for more clues here.

Sugar Money Looking For a Home?

I got a ring on Thursday from my commodity broker in Chicago - I have an IRA managed by his firm, that's separate from the one featured in this blog. I asked him what he thought of cotton - he still likes the trade, citing the fact that cotton traded up towards 90 cents fairly recently.

He also mentioned that the sugar trade is looking a bit long in the tooth, and that fund money may flee sugar soon looking for the next big ag trade - which could be cotton. Check out the money running for the sugar exits already!

Sugar traders are stampeding for the exits!

(Source: Barchart.com)

Recent sugar reading: Sugar Prices Hit 28-Year High: How's Jim Rogers Playing It?

Positions Update

No new trades. I still like the buck. And still holding cotton to see what happens from here.

While I am currently in the deflation camp, I also realize it's very possible that I'm wrong! So we'll keep an eye on the charts.

As always, thanks for reading!

Cotton continues to range trade.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Open positions:

Current Account Value: $24,386.64

Cashed out: $20,000.00
Total value: $44,386.64
Weekly return: 2.1%
2009 YTD return: -52.1% (Yikes!)

Prior yearly returns:
2008: -8%
2007: 175%
2006: 60%
2005: 805%

Initial trading stake: $2,000

Get Ready for 19 Years of On/Off Deflation If History Rhymes

We keep hearing how US households are paying off their debts. The important question is - how much debt is left to be paid off?

For some insights into how much painful deleveraging may be left - I'd like to share what Bill Bonner wrote in today's Daily Reckoning (an excellent free email newsletter by the way):

***

Harvard professor Ken Rogoff says it will take 6-8 years for households to reduce their debts to a more sustainable level. Let's see. We reported on Friday that the big upswing in credit over the last 60 years added about $35 trillion in excess debt to the system. But not all of that is private debt.

Taking the period of the bubble years, in 2000 total debt in the United States came to $26 trillion. Now, it's twice that amount - $52 trillion, of which $38 trillion is private...or more than two and-a- half times GDP. At this level, the private debt absorbs roughly one out of every seven dollars in consumer earnings - in interest and principal payments.

If the private sector undertook to reduce debt back to 2000 levels, it would mean eliminating all the debt accumulated during the bubble years - or about $19 trillion. How long will it take to pay down, write off, inflate away and otherwise shuck $19 trillion? Well, inflation is running below zero - so that is not now a source of debt reduction.

Between write-offs and pay-downs, about $2 trillion has already been cut - over, very roughly, the last 2 years. At least the math is easy.

At that rate, it will take 19 years.

Now, let's go back and look at the Japanese. How long have they been deleveraging? Gosh all mighty...19 years. From 1990 to 2009.

***

For more on deflationary possibilities, here's a case study we did last week on debt deflation.

Centrally Planned Entrepreneurship, More Anecdotal Deflation

On Thursday, I gave a pitch for my startup (Chrometa, auto time capture) at a business innovation showcase here in Sacramento.

A traditional business plan pitch is fairly formulaic - you talk about the pain point you're addressing, your solution, your market, why your team can get it done, etc. Big focus on the market in something like this - how big is it, how can you reach and sell to it.

What really struck and nauseated me on Thursday were the number of companies that talked about their alignment with current government initiatives. At least half. One presentation even had a head shot and quote from Obama about his push for green energy or some crap like that.

I'm not knocking the entrepreneurs...they can run their companies how they choose. What bothers me is the free market taking a back seat to centrally planned government initiatives.

Why not build a product that people or businesses want and sell it to them? That is SO 20th century. This day in age, you pick out an important federal initiative - green, clean, healthcare, etc - and step on up to the trough of stimulus hand outs.

Dear reader, this is not healthy economic behavior. This, I'd imagine, is how you'd run a startup in the old Soviet Union.

This is not the first time, of course, that I've noticed this pandering going on in startup circles - which are traditionally more or less bastions of pure capitalism - but this is the most extreme I've seen it to date. Seems like everyone wants to get their hands on stimulus funds or grants.

When in Rome, I guess...or maybe when in Moscow.

Bulls who are waiting for small businesses to innovate and lead us out of the recession may be waiting longer than usual. There's a lot of effort being wasted in chasing these centrally planned initiatives.

Is This Blog the Ultimate Contrarian Indicator?

To say that I was wiping the egg off my face this week after this bearish post from last Sunday would be an understatement. Lately I have been forecasting less often, as I try to weigh different positions, and ultimately use the charts to see if they support a hypothesis. Perhaps you should take my forecasts and start trading against them!

For what it's worth, I do remain bearish on nearly everything in the medium term here. We still have not seen commodities decouple from stocks and currencies - hence if you believe the market is ultimately heading lower, than caution should also be exercised when looking at these other markets as well.

Uncorrelated markets suddenly traded in perfect harmony when the Great Deleveraging hit - and if we see another bout of it, I can't see a reason why anything will be spared, at least in the short term.

Yes, people will still need to eat, and we'll keep an eye on the food complex in particular - but caution is still the order of the day for me.

More Anecdotal Deflation

Our office in downtown Sacramento gives us a bird's eye view of the continuing unfolding

disaster here in the People's Republic of California. It is fascinating, amusing, and sad, all at the same time.

While intriguing to see a socialist experiment blow up right before my very eyes, with helpless government officials continuing to turn a bad situation worse, there are real people and businesses affected, which is not so cool...at least in the short term.

The state recently added a 3rd furlough day - so state workers now have been handed a forced 15% pay cut, in return for 3 Fridays off a month. Most would not make that trade if given the choice themselves.

The effects on the city economy are very real. Shop owners and employees I've spoken with on "Furlough Fridays" are bummed out - the coffee shop guy next door to my office described yesterday morning as "very slow". My favorite tea shop in town has also experienced a notable drop off on Fridays - half of their customers are state workers, the owner told me.

This is deflation, no doubt about it. Wages are cut. Businesses are hit. They keep prices steady or lower then to lure in bargain shoppers, who have less money to spend.

In a case like the one I'm seeing unwind right before my eyes, the inflation scenario sounds like an academic exercise.

While the state goverment has its hands tied, because it cannot print money, the Federal government is the only entity that could reverse this trend. I suppose if they printed money, restored workers full pay, and made up the different with the newly minted currency, that would eventually be inflationary.

That's the only way I can see the Fed getting this new money into the system. Banks will not lend it, and that doesn't seem likely to change anytime soon. Only public works projects that are paid with newly minted money seem like the only option.

Still, can they print it fast enough to stave off the credit deflation we're seeing left and right? I'm starting to think not.

Quick Reader Survey - Please Share Your Thoughs!

I tossed together a quick 3-question reader survey, and I'd appreciate it if you could take a minute or two to share your thoughts and suggestions with me using the survey link here.

It's always great to connect with you, and your feedback and input help me figure out where to focus my energies...namely on stuff you like, and stuff you'd like to see more of.

The Week's 3 Most Popular Posts...

1. Why 650 is a Generous Fair Value Estimate for the S&P 500
2. Uh Oh - Leading Indicator Baltic Dry Index Turns Down
3. The Outlook for Crude Oil From a Top Industry Exec
   

Positions Update

Still scared...

Current Account Value: $27,511.18

Cashed out: $20,000.00

Total value: $47,511.18

Weekly return: 0%

2009 YTD return: -45.8% :(

Prior year's results: --> Don't try this at home...this is what is known as wreckless trading

2008: -8%

2007: 175%

2006: 60%

2005: 805%

Initial stake: $2,000.00

Looks Like Another Wave of DE-flation...Here's What To Do

Uh oh, looks like a nasty wave of deflation may be coming back to the markets in a big way!

Last time we saw this movie, just about everything except for the US dollar was completely ravaged.

I sold my two remaining futures positions this morning, and now have moved most of my assets into cash. Now may be a good time for you to do something similar - might be time for us to cash out and just head to the beach for the rest of summer.

Last summer/fall, I wish I had done this...but of course I tried to trade my way through things (big mistake).

Well if deflation really is back, what should we do? I thought it'd be the perfect time to check in with Mr. Deflation himself, Robert Prechter.

I started reading Prechter's insights recently, and not a moment too soon - he has saved me considerable short term pain over the last few weeks.

I was turned onto Prechter by a very sharp fellow in our local investment group, who credited Prechter's newsletter for keeping him out of gold and equities during the last bit of deleveraging. (He's the only one in our group who didn't get slammed last year).

So I hope you enjoy and learn from this mini "deflation survival guide" from Dr. Prechter.

***

10 Things You Should and Should Not Do During Deflation
July 8, 2009

This article is part of a syndicated series about deflation from market analyst Robert Prechter, the world’s foremost expert on and proponent of the deflationary scenario. For more on deflation and how you can survive it, download Prechter’s FREE 60-page Deflation Survival eBook, part of Prechter’s NEW Deflation Survival Guide.

The following article was adapted from Robert Prechter’s NEW Deflation Survival eBook, a free 60-page compilation of Prechter’s most important teachings and warnings about deflation.

By Robert Prechter, CMT

1) Should you invest in real estate?

Short Answer: NO

Long Answer: The worst thing about real estate is its lack of liquidity during a bear market. At least in the stock market, when your stock is down 60 percent and you realize you’ve made a horrendous mistake, you can call your broker and get out (unless you’re a mutual fund, insurance company or other institution with millions of shares, in which case, you’re stuck). With real estate, you can’t pick up the phone and sell. You need to find a buyer for your house in order to sell it. In a depression, buyers just go away. Mom and Pop move in with the kids, or the kids move in with Mom and Pop. People start living in their offices or moving their offices into their living quarters. Businesses close down. In time, there is a massive glut of real estate.

– Conquer the Crash, Chapter 16

2) Should you prepare for a change in politics?

Short Answer: YES

Long Answer: At some point during a financial crisis, money flows typically become a political issue. You should keep a sharp eye on political trends in your home country. In severe economic times, governments have been known to ban foreign investment, demand capital repatriation, outlaw money transfers abroad, close banks, freeze bank accounts, restrict or seize private pensions, raise taxes, fix prices and impose currency exchange values. They have been known to use force to change the course of who gets hurt and who is spared, which means that the prudent are punished and the thriftless are rewarded, reversing the result from what it would be according to who deserves to be spared or get hurt. In extreme cases, such as when authoritarians assume power, they simply appropriate or take de facto control of your property.
You cannot anticipate every possible law, regulation or political event that will be implemented to thwart your attempt at safety, liquidity and solvency. This is why you must plan ahead and pay attention. As you do, think about these issues so that when political forces troll for victims, you are legally outside the scope of the dragnet.

– Conquer the Crash, Chapter 27

3) Should you invest in commercial bonds?

Short Answer: NO

Long Answer: If there is one bit of conventional wisdom that we hear repeatedly with respect to investing for a deflationary depression, it is that long-term bonds are the best possible investment. This assertion is wrong. Any bond issued by a borrower who cannot pay goes to zero in a depression. In the Great Depression, bonds of many companies, municipalities and foreign governments were crushed. They became wallpaper as their issuers went bankrupt and defaulted. Bonds of suspect issuers also went way down, at least for a time. Understand that in a crash, no one knows its depth, and almost everyone becomes afraid. That makes investors sell bonds of any issuers that they fear could default. Even when people trust the bonds they own, they are sometimes forced to sell them to raise cash to live on. For this reason, even the safest bonds can go down, at least temporarily, as AAA bonds did in 1931 and 1932.

– Conquer the Crash, Chapter 15

4) Should you take precautions if you run a business?

Short Answer: YES

Long Answer: Avoid long-term employment contracts with employees. Try to locate in a state with “at-will” employment laws. Red tape and legal impediments to firing could bankrupt your company in a financial crunch, thus putting everyone in your company out of work.

If you run a business that normally carries a large business inventory (such as an auto or boat dealership), try to reduce it. If your business requires certain manufactured specialty items that may be hard to obtain in a depression, stock up.

If you are an employer, start making plans for what you will do if the company’s cash flow declines and you have to cut expenditures. Would it be best to fire certain people? Would it be better to adjust all salaries downward an equal percentage so that you can keep everyone employed?

Finally, plan how you will take advantage of the next major bottom in the economy. Positioning your company properly at that time could ensure success for decades to come.

– Conquer the Crash, Chapter 30

5) Should you invest in collectibles?

Short Answer: NO

Long Answer: Collecting for investment purposes is almost always foolish. Never buy anything marketed as a collectible. The chances of losing money when collectibility is priced into an item are huge. Usually, collecting trends are fads. They might be short-run or long-run fads, but they eventually dissolve.

– Conquer the Crash, Chapter 17

6) Should you do anything with respect to your employment?

Short Answer: YES

Long Answer: If you have no special reason to believe that the company you work for will prosper so much in a contracting economy that its stock will rise in a bear market, then cash out any stock or stock options that your company has issued to you (or that you bought on your own).

If your remuneration is tied to the same company’s fortunes in the form of stock or stock options, try to convert it to a liquid income stream. Make sure you get paid actual money for your labor.

If you have a choice of employment, try to think about which job will best weather the coming financial and economic storm. Then go get it.

– Conquer the Crash, Chapter 31

7) Should you speculate in stocks?

Short Answer: NO

Long Answer: Perhaps the number one precaution to take at the start of a deflationary crash is to make sure that your investment capital is not invested “long” in stocks, stock mutual funds, stock index futures, stock options or any other equity-based investment or speculation. That advice alone should be worth the time you [spend to read Conquer the Crash].

In 2000 and 2001, countless Internet stocks fell from $50 or $100 a share to near zero in a matter of months. In 2001, Enron went from $85 to pennies a share in less than a year. These are the early casualties of debt, leverage and incautious speculation.

– Conquer the Crash, Chapter 20

8) Should you call in loans and pay off your debt?

Short Answer: YES

Long Answer: Have you lent money to friends, relatives or co-workers? The odds of collecting any of these debts are usually slim to none, but if you can prod your personal debtors into paying you back before they get further strapped for cash, it will not only help you but it will also give you some additional wherewithal to help those very same people if they become destitute later.

If at all possible, remain or become debt-free. Being debt-free means that you are freer, period. You don’t have to sweat credit card payments. You don’t have to sweat home or auto repossession or loss of your business. You don’t have to work 6 percent more, or 10 percent more, or 18 percent more just to stay even.

– Conquer the Crash, Chapter 29

9) Should you invest in commodities, such as crude oil?

Short Answer: Mostly NO

Long Answer: Pay particular attention to what happened in 1929-1932, the three years of intense deflation in which the stock market crashed. As you can see, commodities crashed, too.

You can get rich being short commodity futures in a deflationary crash. This is a player’s game, though, and I am not about to urge a typical investor to follow that course. If you are a seasoned commodity trader, avoid the long side and use rallies to sell short. Make sure that your broker keeps your liquid funds in T-bills or an equally safe medium.

There can be exceptions to the broad trend. A commodity can rise against the trend on a war, a war scare, a shortage or a disruption of transport. Oil is an example of a commodity with that type of risk. This commodity should have nowhere to go but down during a depression.

– Conquer the Crash, Chapter 21

10) Should you invest in cash?

Short Answer: YES

Long Answer: For those among the public who have recently become concerned that being fully invested in one stock or stock fund is not risk-free, the analysts’ battle cry is “diversification.” They recommend having your assets spread out in numerous different stocks, numerous different stock funds and/or numerous different (foreign) stock markets. Advocates of junk bonds likewise counsel prospective investors that having lots of different issues will reduce risk.

This “strategy” is bogus. Why invest in anything unless you have a strong opinion about where it’s going and a game plan for when to get out? Diversification is gospel today because investment assets of so many kinds have gone up for so long, but the future is another matter. Owning an array of investments is financial suicide during deflation. They all go down, and the logistics of getting out of them can be a nightmare. There can be weird exceptions to this rule, such as gold in the early 1930s when the government fixed the price, or perhaps some commodity that is crucial in a war, but otherwise, all assets go down in price during deflation except one: cash.

– Conquer the Crash, Chapter 18
……….

For more on deflation, download Prechter’s FREE 60-page Deflation Survival eBook or browse various deflation topics like those below at www.elliottwave.com/deflation.

• What happens during deflation?
• Why is deflation bad?
• Effects of deflation
• Deflationary spiral
• And much more in Prechter’s FREE Deflation Survival Guide.

Robert Prechter, Chartered Market Technician, is the world's foremost expert on and proponent of the deflationary scenario. Prechter is the founder and CEO of Elliott Wave International, author of Wall Street best-sellers Conquer the Crash and Elliott Wave Principle and editor of The Elliott Wave Theorist monthly market letter since 1979.