Showing posts with label growing money supply. Show all posts
Showing posts with label growing money supply. Show all posts

Saturday, August 08, 2009

Why the FDIC Will Soon Require Hundreds of Billions in Bailout Funds...At Least!

Despite the self congratulatory nature of the financial media in the recent weeks and months, I remain highly skeptical that the worst is indeed behind us. Down in the trenches of daily economic life, I can't find any noticable signs of improvement. In fact, the only thing that seems to have changed is a sharp 50% rally in the major US indices, which has buoyed bullishness towards the stock market.

If my suspicions are correct, then one house of cards that's sure to be blown over during the first gust of economic bad news is the FDIC. It's chances of funding it's insurance obligations is laughable to say the least. And because it's not politically palatable to allow the FDIC to default on these obligations, this means more bailouts are on the way - likely to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars.

To explore this theme in more detail, we'll turn it over to our good friend Bud Conrad from Casey Research. Bud, a frequent guest columnist, cranks out top notch investment analysis that's "too heavy" for mainstream finance from his home in Silicon Valley. I am a subscriber of Bud's, and also am fortunate enough to be a part of the local SV investment group that Casey Research organizes and Bud participates in.

Read on for Bud's insightful piece...

***

The FDIC Is in Trouble

By Bud Conrad, Editor, The Casey Report

As we all know, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) guarantees depositors that they’ll get their money back if a bank fails, at least up to a certain amount. To fund its operations, the FDIC collects small fees from the banks that are held in reserve for the purpose of taking over troubled banks and paying off depositors.

Since the Great Depression, a period marked by widespread runs on banks, the FDIC has done a good job of fulfilling its mandate. So how are they doing in this crisis?

In a nutshell, they are in trouble.

The FDIC insures 8,246 institutions, with $13.5 trillion in assets. Not all of them are going bankrupt, of course. Yet as of late July, a disturbing 64 banks had gone belly up this year – the most since 1992 – costing the FDIC $12.5 billion. At the end of Q1, the agency was already asking for emergency funding.

And worse, much worse, is likely yet to come. The following chart shows the total assets on the books of the FDIC’s list of 305 troubled banks. The list doesn’t include the biggest banks that are considered too big to fail, as they are being separately supported with bailouts. By contrast, if the banks on this list fail, the FDIC is on the hook to have to step in and take them over and, of course, make depositors whole.


Other measures of how serious the losses at banks are becoming can be seen in the chart below, which shows charge-offs and non-current loans at all banks. You can see that the Net Charge-offs remain stubbornly high, with banks charging off almost $40 billion in bad loans in the last two quarters alone. And the number of non-current loans – loans where payments are not being kept up – is soaring.

Together, these measures indicate the potential for more big failures and more big bailouts coming down the pike.


About Those Reserves…

Into the battle against bank insolvency the Fed brings a level of reserves that can best be described as paper-thin. From almost $60 billion last fall, the FDIC’s reserves have been drawn down to only about $13 billion today, a 16-year low. A quick look at the FDIC’s own data shows us how inadequate those reserves are compared to the deposits they are now insuring.

The chart below says it all:


As you can see, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation currently covers each dollar on deposit with a trivial 2/10ths of a penny.

And even that understates the seriousness of the situation: the $4.8 trillion in deposits the FDIC is providing coverage on doesn’t include the expansion that now extends insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 for normal bank accounts. That likely brings the exposure of the FDIC closer to $6 trillion. But that’s pretty inconsequential at this point: using any reasonable accounting method, the FDIC is already bankrupt and will require hundreds of billions of dollars in government bailouts just to keep the doors open.

So, given the dire shape of its finances, what measures is the FDIC taking, you know, to batten down the hatches and all that?

For starters, they are expanding their mandate by guaranteeing bank loans – $350 billion and counting at this point. And the government has tapped the FDIC to play a pivotal role in guaranteeing the loans issued to buy toxic waste through the government’s highly problematic and fraud-prone new Private Public Investment Partnership (PPIP). The FDIC’s commitment to the PPIP is and may become limited based on its resources.

It is hard to draw any other conclusion but that hundreds of billions in new funding will be required to keep the FDIC operating. Given the catastrophic consequences of the FDIC failing, starting with a bank run of biblical proportions, there’s no question it will get whatever funding it needs. By loading the new loan guarantee responsibilities and the PPIP onto the FDIC’s back, the administration will go back to Congress and ask for the next large bailout.

Of course, in the end, all of this falls on the taxpayer, either directly in the form of more taxes or indirectly via the destruction of the dollar’s purchasing power. Another bale of straw on the camel’s back, and another reason to be concerned about holding paper dollars for the long term.

PS: If you still trust the government to take care of you and yours when the feces hits the fan, you’re on the path to financial disaster. But even in times of crisis, there are things you can do to protect yourself – for example, by betting against the insane machinations of the government and Fed. You can’t make them stop, but at least you can profit from them. Read about Bud Conrad’s favorite investment of 2009… by clicking here.

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Is Deflation “So 2008”? Hyperinflation Trade Looking Crowded

As the Federal Reserve continues to print money, the “hyperinflation trade” seems to be a crowded one.

The premise seems sound and reasonable – whenever a government prints money and devalues its own currency, rising prices follow. A deflationary environment cannot hold for a sustained period of time, because the government will print money, or drop dollars from helicopters, or do whatever it needs to do to create price inflation.

But is it really that simple?

If so, then gold is playing one hell of a rope-a-dope on all of us. Why has gold not been able to crank past the $1,000 mark decisively if inflation, and perhaps hyperinflation, are in the cards? After all, the market is supposed to be a forward looking mechanism!

Perhaps gold is merely climbing the “wall of worry” on the way to the final mania stage... doing a fine job at shaking out the weak hands and non-believers before ultimately skyrocketing to $1500…$2000…or higher.

Gold has risen each of the last eight years versus the dollar, and appears poised to extend that streak again this year, so maybe I’m being overly harsh.

However thus far, plays on hyperinflation have mostly disappointed. Sure, gold has rallied off it’s lows, but so have the broader markets, in what appears to be a textbook bear market rally.

Recently I’ve started wondering if there’s something fundamentally wrong with the hyperinflation hypothesis. A few weeks ago, I mused that the “buy gold” trade seemed a little overdone, at least in the short term…punctuated by Northwest Mutual’s purchase of gold for the 1st time in the company’s 152 year history.

When insurance companies are rolling up to the party, you can bet the cops are also on the way and ready to shut the joint down!

So please indulge me for a moment, and let’s ponder “what if” Helicopter Ben can’t print dollars fast enough.

Here’s what could gum up the efforts of the money printers says Robert Prechter in the June 2009 edition of The Elliott Wave Theorist:

“You can’t beat deflation in a credit based system.”

Prechter says that growth in money supply requires activity on the part of lenders and borrowers. And once a credit bubble implodes, there is no way to restart the engine.
Japan’s recent deflationary recession is a classic example of this – despite unprecedented efforts by the Japanese government to devalue the Yen and generate inflation, they weren’t able to do either!

No amount of public works projects, increases in federal spending, and monetization of debt has yet been able to snap Japan out of its deflationary nightmare. When its credit bubble popped in 1989, it stayed popped for good.

Was Japan an anomaly? With the US employing the same “hair of the dog” tactics, we’re going to find out soon!

If we had a cash based economy, then printing money would indeed cause price inflation, Prechter says. But in a credit based economy, credit is being destroyed at a much faster rate than the Fed can print.

(Roughly $14 trillion in credit down the drains so far, versus $2 trillion in deficit spending and monetization…so quite a large gap).

Eventually, enough credit is destroyed that the Fed will be able to affect the money supply. So, ironically, we could see hyperinflation at the end of this all…of whatever little money is remaining!

As engaging as this intellectual exercise is, at the end of the day we need to figure out where to put our money! There is no safe haven, after all – even if you’ve got your money in cash, you’re “long cash”…and “long” the currency you’re stocking it in!
So what are we to do?

Well, I think we’ve got to watch the charts, and listen to what the market is telling us. This is a time to protect our capital, not to reach for extra yield. If an asset class is getting taken to the cleaners…get out! That was the biggest mistake I made during the Great Deleveraging of 2008…that was the time to follow your stops, go to the beach, and catch a little R&R while the world fell apart.

That said – if we see gold smoke past $1050, $1100, etc – we probably want to be in gold. We’ll take that as a cue that our musings about credit based systems, while fun, were perhaps wrong!
For now, I think cash is not a bad place to be. With gold not yet able to break through, and the hyperinflation trade getting more crowded by the day, another burst of deflation could catch most folks with their pants down.

Remember, in a deflationary environment, cash is king…so don’t worry about yield. Cash gains purchasing power as prices deflate around it…so if you’re able to preserve your capital in nominal terms, we could do quite well in real terms!


Quick Reader Survey - Please Share Your Thoughs!

I tossed together a quick 3-question reader survey, and I'd appreciate it if you could take a minute or two to share your thoughts and suggestions with me using the survey link here.

It's always great to connect with you, and your feedback and input help me figure out where to focus my energies...namely on stuff you like, and stuff you'd like to see more of.


The Week's 5 Most Popular Posts...

Positions Update

We bought the sugar breakout this week...I don't know how much legs this rally could have - and honestly, I don't care - it's a 3-year high for sugar, so we gotta buy this breakout!

OK, if you want a fundamental reason - we've got a global deficit this year - and these can always be fun on the upside!


Current Account Value: $31,385.06

Cashed out: $20,000.00
Total value: $51,385.06
Weekly return: About even
2009 YTD return: -38.0%

2008: -8%
2007: 175%
2006: 60%
2005: 805%

Initial stake: $2,000.00

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

How to Time the Treasury Market

Surprisingly, Treasuries have been rallying in the middle of each month, while falling at the beginning and end of the month, according to some keen observations by Tom Dyson.

Why so? Tom says that for some reason, the market does not seem to be accounting for the fact that the government is issuing huge amounts of Treasuries at the beginning and end of the month.

In the middle of the month, when the Treasury is not issuing bonds, and the Fed is still buying, prices rally.

Thinking of shorting the long bonds? May want to wait until the end of the month.

Besides...we could have some serious resistance upcoming. I prefer to stay on the sidelines for now. If interest rates go as high as we think they will...easily to double digits...then there will be plenty of time to make money on this trade.

The 10-year bond is breaking down.
(Source: Barchart.com)

Monday, June 08, 2009

It's Still a "Bull Market" in Money Creation

The bull market in money creation is still intact!

After a short "correction" a few months ago, the printing presses are revved up and running faster than ever before.

The continued strength in equity and asset prices...much to the surprise of many smart traders...seems to be validating the theory that this bear market rally is on the inflation juice!


I would exercise extreme caution with any short positions, as this "money printing" could very well cause asset prices to go to the moon in nominal terms...even as they are being trashed in real terms!

Remember - inflation is a "hidden tax" on your savings, and one of the preferred techniques used by governments throughout the history of the world to get themselves out of deficit problems.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Dollar Hammered After Fed Announces It Will (Actually) Print Money

Yesterday, the US Federal Reserve announced it will buy up to $300 billion of US long-term Treasury securities over the next 3 months.

Where will the Fed get that money?  It will essentially create it out of thin air - also known as "printing money."

Shockingly the markets did not like this announcement from the Fed with respect to the dollar - apparently traders fear that by printing new dollars, each existing dollar in circulation will decrease in value.  Check out these moves just from the past 24 hours in the dollar and gold:

The dollar gets taken to the woodshed.

As traders flock to a form of money that can't be printed.

In a prescient guest article last December, Bud Conrad stated his belief that The Fed would ultimately opt for inflationary policies, rather than risk deflation.  

But the longer-term expectation is that Bernanke’s assertion – an assertion now backed up by action – that the government can and will print new money to any extent needed is the more important force.

Further Reading: Battle of the Flations, by Bud Conrad



Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Deflation? What Deflation? Girl Scouts Adjusting for Cookie INFLATION

As our Fed prints money to battle this current "deflationary spiral", the economically pragmatic Girl Scouts are bracing their sales force for the very real effects of inflation.

Here are some "Fingertip Facts for Girls and Families" listed on the Girl Scouts website, so these brave girls can educate their neighbors about the very real effects of inflation on Girl Scout Cookies.

A decision by Girl Scouting
• The national Girl Scouting office said it was okay to change the weight of some licensed Girl Scout
cookie packages.
• Rising costs of food and gas have made baking cookies more expensive.

It costs more to make a cookie than it did one year ago
• You probably know that your family’s grocery bill is rising. The same is true for the bakery’s food bill for
ingredients like flour, baking oils and cocoa.
• It’s expensive to fill a car’s gas tank nowadays. Imagine the cost of filling the tanks of all the trucks that transport ingredients and deliver baked cookies.

Some things never change
• The taste is as great as always!
• The average consumer is still expected to buy 2-4 packages according to national consumer insights research.
• The number one reason consumers do not buy Girl Scout cookies is simply because they are not asked.

Why the new sizes are the right sizes
• Even if money is tight, consumers want to support you! Share your goal with customers when asking themto buy Girl Scout cookies.

What if a customer asks: Is this cookie package smaller?
• Always tell the truth. Here’s a great way you might respond:
Yes, the packages are a little smaller. That’s because the cost of baking cookies has gone up along with food and gas prices. Of course, the delicious taste of your favorite Girl Scout cookie is exactly the same!

Brett again - I'm wondering if some of the TARP funds could have been better spent subsidizing girl scout cookies. These tasty delights were already quite expensive!

We'll let CBM readers weigh in - has anyone bought the "newly sized" Girl Scout Cookie Box this year?

Most Popular Articles This Month