Showing posts with label rising inflation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rising inflation. Show all posts

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Live From Singapore: An Exclusive Interview with Jim Rogers (Commodities, China, Inflation, and More!)

I’m thrilled to report that while in Singapore last week, I had the great honor of interviewing Jim Rogers in person.  He was extremely kind in hosting me and entertaining my questions, and I’m excited to be able to share our fun 45-minute chat with you here.

As you may know, I’m a longtime reader and fan of Jim Rogers - and one of my constant frustrations with mainstream financial outlets is that, while they frequently interview Rogers, they lob too many idiotic questions his way, like “What should the Fed do?”

So I hope that you find our discussion around his current world and financial outlook insightful, especially if you’ve been following his work as closely as I have.

All of his books are excellent, as you probably know - three in particular had quite profound effects on my thinking about investing, the world, and life in general.  If you haven’t yet read all of these, I’d highly recommend you pick up a copy of his investing classics:
And now, on to our interview...

Still a Bull on China, and the Renminbi Too

Jim Rogers was a bull on China decades before it became fashionable, and he’s still wildly optimistic about China’s future.

“I believe China’s going to become the next great nation in the world,” he says.

“People call the Chinese ‘communist’...California and Massachusettes are more communist than China,” he remarked with a grin.

“The Chinese communist party is very smart - as are the leaders here in Singapore.  There is a thorough application process to apply to run for office - all applicants are well vetted.”  He says it’s quite rigorous, like “applying to Princeton” and added that “a guy like Obama would never have been able to run here (Singapore).”

Rogers has driven across China three times, and has seen much of the country’s evolution from the ground.  He’s been enthusiastic about China for some time now - at least since his Adventure Capitalist trip (cerca 2000).  Anyone who’s invested alongside his long-time bullish views on China has seen very handsome returns.

He says that according to local legend, Singapore was a role model for China’s development.  Singapore has evolved very rapidly over the past four decades, from a Southeast Asia backwater in the 1960’s, into one of the most prosperous countries in the world today.

“The rumor is that Deng Xioping visited here (Singapore) in 1978 - when he saw what was going on, he returned to China, and started to open the country up,” Rogers told me.  “In fact, if you ask some people here, they’ll say the Chinese are still keeping a close eye on what’s going on here.”

An interesting side play he likes for the years and decades ahead is Chinese tourism.

“The Chinese have not been able to travel for the last 300 years.  Now they can - and they are going to flood the world with tourism for years to come,” he says.

Chinese tourists should have a lot of purchasing power from a strong currency, if Rogers is right.  He cites the Chinese renminbi as one of his favorite picks right now, and believes it’s about as close to a sure thing as you can get.

“Here in Singapore, they've allowed their currency rise to mitigate inflation.  I expect the Chinese will eventually have to do the same thing.”

“You’re better off cutting growth in advance, than allowing inflation to get out of control.  If growth drops to 3%, who cares?  That’s better than letting inflation get out of control, because once it does, it’s very tough to reign in.”

"Then you have to incur a recession or worse to control inflation."

I asked if inflation is really running around 5% as reported in China and surrounding Asia.

“Who knows - but at least they admit they have inflation!  They’re not trying to deny its existence like the US,” he quipped.

He blames the United States, and Japan to a lesser extent, for “printing money like crazy and exporting inflation to the rest of the world.”

Commodities Should Remain Hot

“Most of my portfolio is in commodities, and currencies,” he shared.  “I expect to make money in commodities because, if demand continues to rise, that is bullish for commodities.”

But what if we see a repeat of the financial collapse of 2008?

“If demand collapses, I anticipate the central banks of the world will print more money, and that will then cause commodities to rise,” he counters.

Agriculture is still his favorite, thanks to supply constraints that are nowhere close to being solved - including a lack of farmers.

“The average farmer in the United States is 57 years old,” Rogers shared (providing me with yet another “How the heck did he know that offhand?” moment).

“Who’s going to farm the land 10 years from now?  These guys will be 67...if they’re still around.  And nobody is graduating with farming degrees today.”

“There are just not enough farmers in the world.  There are vast stretches of empty land in Japan, believe it or not - with nobody to farm them.”

He thinks this commodity bull market could continue to rock and roll for some time because “little or no supply has come on line yet.”  He points out that the commodity sector was starting to attract attention pre-2008, as its bull run began around 1999, but the 2008 financial crisis knocked a lot of potential new supply offline.  Which of course sets the stage for further price increases.

Bearish on the US and UK - Crisis Soon?

“The US has peaked in relative power, if not absolute power as well,” Rogers says.  He believes the US is now on a post-empire downward trajectory of sorts, analogous to the UK last century.

“Around 1918, the UK went into decline.  By the mid 1970’s, it was bankrupt.”

“Starting in 1979, it experienced a bounceback rally of sorts - thanks to their oil fields in the North Sea.  Most people give Maggie Thatcher credit for their comeback, but the real white knight for the UK was the North Sea oil discovery,” he said.

“You give me the largest oil field in the world, and I’ll show you a good time too,” Rogers remarked with a grin.

“But the US would need 4 or 5 North Sea oil fields to save the current situation,” he says.

Why so many?

“Because the Federal debt is unpayable.”  The financial profligacy of the United States disturbs Rogers quite a bit - he believes we’ve reached a point of no return, and thinks another crisis could start as early as this fall.

“Foreigners are already starting to get cold feet about investing in the US,” he said, citing the fact that some Swiss banks are no longer buying any US shares.

I asked if he thought the current system of government in the US was ultimately salvageable - he paused for a bit to think, and said with some level of remorse: “I don’t think so, unfortunately.  Not without some level of serious system shock or failure.”

“Plato wrote that the natural progression of government is from dictatorship, to oligarchy, to democracy, to chaos.  So we may be on the track from democracy to chaos in the US.  We’d need a serious shock to shake people up.”

Does the End of QE2 Really Matter?

With QE2 now officially set to end, I asked if it mattered.

“No, it doesn’t really matter.  They’ll continue to print money.  Maybe they’ll call it QE3, or Cupcake, or something else" - but he's thinks they'll continue to print.

With next year being an election year, he expects that the powers that be in the US will do whatever it takes to keep the economy looking good.  “Nobody wants to be held responsible for an economic mess,” he told me , expecting that the US government will continue to paper over their problems, and perhaps even accelerate their efforts to do so.

Actions to Consider - Investing and Personal

And with this upbeat outlook for Americans and other Westerners, what personal actions should we take to protect our portfolios - not to mention our savings, and most importantly, our personal freedom?

As discussed, commodities are still Rogers’ favorite place to be - especially agriculture and energy, because the supply bottlenecks that were in place at the start of this commodity bull market have barely begun to be addressed.  And it can take 5-10 years or more for supply to come online, he pointed out, citing again the 10-year delay between the North Sea oil discovery and its becoming a productive oil field.

Fforeign currencies are his preferable hedge against further anticipated US dollar weakness - with his favorite being the Chinese renminbi.

But what if things get really sticky in the US?  I asked him his thoughts on protecting assets from potential “patriotic” confiscation by the US government (if Uncle Sam, say, decides he needs a little help in paying off his debts).

“Foreign exchange controls are coming to the US.  The UK had exchange controls by 1939, and they remained in place until Thatcher repealed them,” he said.

“They never work.  But politicians always resort to them.”

“So, while it’s still legal, and ethical, to do so, I would recommend diversifying your money outside of the US.”

(I took this as a personal homework assignment, as later that day I walked into a Singapore bank , with only my US passport in hand, and asked if I could open up an account.  No dice, they said - I’d need to show a work permit.  But I did manage to stir up things with the bank teller a bit - you could tell she was not anxious to open up a foreign bank account for an American.)

“To my knowledge, no country to date has expropriated money from overseas that was already there before exchange controls were instituted - but the US is always an exception,” Rogers remarked regarding the safety of money outside of US soil.

Having recently read Barton Biggs’ Wealth, War and Wisdom - an excellent study of wealth preservation during World War II - I asked whether a business would be harder to confiscate than, say, a lump of cash sitting in a foreign bank account.

“Of course,” Rogers agreed.  “It’d be harder to expropriate an overseas farm, for example.”

So where to from here?

“I don’t know what to tell you,” Rogers advised me, “except to move to Asia, and teach your children Mandarin.”

“Teach them to farm, too.”

He has certainly followed his own advice - he now lives in Singapore with his wife and two daughters.  And his girls, ages 3 and 7, are incredibly cute blond girls who amuse and floor the locals (Singapore is 70% Chinese) with their fluent Mandarin.

But what about my wife’s job at Intel in California?

“Your wife should leave Intel...and take up farming,” he said with a grin.

Jim Rogers latest book is A Gift to My Children: A Father's Lessons for Life and Investing.  If you haven't yet read it, go pick up a copy now!

Big thanks to Jim for hosting me and speaking with me.  It was a real thrill to speak with him in person, and I'm really glad we got to dive into these discussion topics in depth.

People I shared this story with asked me what he's like in person - he's a GREAT guy, super cool.  Very easy to see why he's so universally loved and admired around the world,

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Did You Know...China Has Actually 'Decoupled" From Commodities?

Most bullish commodity cases offer the seemingly irrefutable argument of "China" as a driver of higher prices in the weeks, months and years ahead. The logic is sound—demand for [Insert Commodity X here] is growing like gangbusters, and this trend will not only continue, but is likely to accelerate as China becomes a net importer for [Commodity X]. This increased demand, coupled with stagnant-to-declining supply for [Commodity X], will give prices a strong tail wind in the months ahead.

Sounds great in theory—but then again, so did communism. So I began to wonder if China's economy was in fact serving as a reliable leading indicator for commodities. In theory, a strong Chinese economy should lead to higher prices for many of its favorite commodities, but an economic setback (like the one we saw in 2008) could send prices on a one-way trade heading south.

Please read the rest of my piece at Hard Assets Investor.

(And by the way, this is my first ever guest piece for our friends at HAI - so if you'd be so kind as to give the post a generous five star rating, I'd really appreciate it!)

Friday, January 22, 2010

Inflation and Deflation - What to Consider, and What Indicates We're Wrong?

Stumped about the inflation/deflation debate? Good news - you're not alone!

Hard Asset Investor's Brad Zigler is also somewhat undecided on the subject. Though he leans toward inflation, he acknowledges that very strong deflationary forces are also in play.

Though you know that I'm one of the lonely souls in the deflationary camp (along with many readers!), I also am not 100% sure of which way things are going to unfold.

But that's OK - that's why we follow the trend! Ultimately, the market will be the final arbiter of this debate, and there's nothing we can argue today that will change what the market is going to do.

So, grab your position, but by all means, be flexible and ready to change if we're proven wrong. Personally, I'm watching the stock market, and the dollar...especially the dollar. If it takes out it's old lows, that would indicate a serious flaw in our dollar rally/stock tanking scenario.

That looks unlikely right now, though, as the dollar looks to be at the start of a major rally.

Sunday, December 20, 2009

Jeff Clark's Thoughts on How to Predict the Price of Gold

Casey's Jeff Clark shares his observations about where the price of gold may be heading in years to come.

Regular readers know that my opinion differs from Clark's in the short term, as I think gold is in for a massive correction. However I do agree that the most likely medium to long term scenario is a moonshot for gold prices. The real question is when.

***

How to Predict the Price of Gold

Jeff Clark, Editor, Casey’s Gold & Resource Report

Long-term readers know that gold moves inversely to the dollar, meaning if the dollar drops, gold tends to rise (and vice versa). This happens with about 80% regularity. But what many gold writers haven’t acknowledged is the leveraged movement our favorite metal has demonstrated this year to the world’s reserve currency.

The U.S. dollar index, a six-currency gauge of the greenback’s value, has dropped 7.8% so far this year (as of December 3). Meanwhile, gold is up 38.7% year-to-date. In other words, for every 1% drop in the dollar index, gold has risen 4.9%. If that approximate percentage holds over time, one can begin to estimate what the gold price might be if you know what the dollar might do.

While the dollar is likely to bounce at some point, making gold correct, the long-term fate of the dollar has already dried in cement. If the dollar were simply to return to its March 2008 low of 71.30 next year – a 4.6% drop from current levels – this would imply a rise in gold of 22.5% and a price of about $1,478 an ounce.

The long-term scenario is more dramatic. If you believe the dollar will lose half its value from current levels, this would imply a gold price around $4,164. If you believe it will lose 75% of its value, gold would reach about $5,642. Doug Casey has called for a $5,000 gold price; if he’s right, guess what that implies for the dollar?

And think about this: these calculations ignore what else might “show up,” such as when price inflation shows up in the economy, the greater public shows up to buy gold, or the Chinese don’t show up at an auction. Could $5,000 gold be too low?

Unless you think the dollar’s problems are solved, its eventual demise is gold’s eventual glory. Prepare, and invest, accordingly.

Jeff Clark is editor of Casey’s Gold and Resource Report, where each month he brings readers some of the best research and investment recommendations in the business.

Sunday, December 06, 2009

Gold CAN Still Go Down; Trading Against Jim Rogers and Richard Russell; Worst Case Scenarios Already "Priced In"

So Gold CAN Still Go Down, After All

Last week was shaping up to be another banner one for gold, as the old relic kept on climbing, day after day...that is, until it stopped.

Gold's one-way rise experienced a sharp setback on Friday, dropping nearly $50 on the day, and over $60 in intraday measures.

Friday was the biggest down day for gold in some time.
(Source: Barchart.com)

Perhaps related, perhaps not, The Financial Times reported on Wednesday that China is wary of the danger of a gold "bubble" (hat tip to my good friend and regular reader Super Joe for sending this link along).

Hu Xiaolian, the vice-governor of the central bank, said Beijing would not buy gold indiscriminately.

“We must keep in mind the long-term effects when considering what to use as our reserves,” she said. “We must watch out for bubbles forming on certain assets and be careful in those areas.”

China announced this year that it had quietly doubled its gold reserves to 1,054 tonnes, the world’s fifth largest holding. India has also joined the rush, gobbling up half the IMF’s gold sale.

China's ever-increasing interest has spawned the popular gold bull theory that the Chinese have established a "$1,000 floor" price for the metal. In other words, with the Chinese buying up more gold on the dips, one needn't worry about the possibility of gold ever dipping down to triple-digit territory ever again.

The only problem with theories like this is that, however sound they may appear, they are usually wrong. The market takes great delight in squashing "absolute" myths and theories, and I suspect this one will be no different.

But - you may interject - with the government printing money like it's going out of style, won't that result in rising price inflation, and rising gold prices? It sure may - I just suspect that it will take longer than most investors anticipate, thanks to the massive amounts of credit that will be written off in the coming years, resulting in some wicked near-term debt deflation.


Trading Against Our Hero, Jim Rogers

Anytime you find yourself on the other side of the trade from Jim Rogers, you probably want to seriously reconsider your position.

That's where we find ourselves now, though, with Rogers continuing to reiterate his distaste for the dollar. To be honest, I don't like the dollar fundamentally either, but believe that paradoxically, it's due to rise in the near term because of its inherent flaws.

In other words, I agree with everything Rogers says, except for his timing. We'll see who's right - I wouldn't blame you one bit for siding with Rogers - but I'm sticking to my guns on this one...at least for now.


And...Richard Russell, While We're At It

The Great Richard Russell believes that gold is going to move higher, no matter what happens, according to The Daily Crux.

Question -- What would it mean if Industrials and Transports broke out to joint new highs?

Answer -- I think it would mean that the Bernanke Fed was beginning to win the war against deflation, and assets were once more beginning to inflate. In that case, gold should move higher.

Question -- What would it mean if this advance topped out, and the bear market was taking over again?

Answer -- I think it would mean that the Fed had lost its battle against inflation. If that was the case, I believe the Fed would spend even more, there would be even more stimulus programs and interest rates would remain at zero "for the duration." In that case, gold should move higher.


(Source: The Daily Crux)

Well I hate to trade against Russell too - a true legend. But, the dollar bull/gold bear camp is so deserted, that I guess it just comes with the territory that our favorite investors will be on the other side of the trade...because there are so few on our side!


Why Worst Case Scenarios are Already "Priced Into" These Markets

Tom Dyson, one of my favorite investment writers/analysts, is also one of the very few lone soles left in the debt deflation / dollar bull camp (last one out, please turn out the lights!)

Last week, Tom penned an article that I thought articulated the case for a near term dollar rally brilliantly - and our good friends at Stansberry & Associates were kind enough to allow us to reprint the piece in it's entirety here.


Positions Update - Still Really Short the S&P, Long the Dollar

Nothing's changed here - still waiting for the dollar to bottom, and the S&P to top. It's been a maddening wait.

We think the dollar is the lynchpin to the whole equation, and that a dollar bottoming should roughly coincide with a top in the other markets. Friday was an encouraging sign, as the dollar rallied sharply. Has it finally put in a low? We shall see!

The dollar rallied sharply on Friday to end the week - did this mark the start of a mega-rally?
(Source: Barchart.com)

Though this rally appears to be running on fumes, it's still running...at least for now.
(Source: Barchart.com)

Open positions:


Thanks for reading!

Current Account Value: $17,217.50

Cashed out: $20,000.00
Total value: $37,217.50
2009 Returns: Ugh, too depressing to calculate right now...

Prior yearly returns:
2008: -8%
2007: 175%
2006: 60%
2005: 805%

Initial trading stake: $2,000

Wednesday, December 02, 2009

Why the Worst Case Conclusions are Already "Priced Into" the Market

Tom Dyson, one of my favorite investment writers/analysts, is also one of the very few lone soles left in the debt deflation / dollar bull camp (last one out, please turn out the lights!)

Last week, Tom penned an article that I thought articulated the case for a near term dollar rally brilliantly - and our good friends at Stansberry & Associates were kind enough to allow us to reprint the piece in it's entirety here.

So enjoy Tom's bet with his boss (who's another great investor BTW). And if you're interested in subscribing to Tom Dyson's premium service, The 12% Letter, we've arranged for readers here to receive a 6-Month Risk-Free Trial (click here to learn more).

***

Porter Stansberry Is My Patsy
By Tom Dyson

On Friday, I made a bet with my boss...

Porter Stansberry is my boss and a good friend. He's one of my favorite investment analysts in the world. An investor who is not reading his monthly newsletter is flying blind in a rainstorm.

But I have a disagreement with him right now. Porter says the United States government is broke. He says there's no way it'll be able to borrow enough money over the next 12 months to cover its obligations. There's going to be an enormous government cash crunch unless it "prints" the money.

By printing this money, the government is forcing our foreign creditors to make an impossible choice: Stay with the dollar and see 50% or more of your intrinsic value wiped out... or abandon the dollar completely and risk a global crisis.

Whatever happens, Porter says, gold soars hundreds of percent, the dollar spirals toward zero, and the price of government debt erodes.

Last week, I bet Porter he's wrong.

Specifically, I bet him the interest rate on the 10-year Treasury note would be below 4% at this time next year. The interest rate on the 10-year Treasury note is the price the United States government must pay to borrow money over 10 years. If the market thinks the government is broke and can't afford its debt, this interest rate will rise. Porter bet it'll rise above 4% in the next 12 months. I bet it will not.

Look at this chart of the dollar in terms of the Swiss franc. The Swiss franc is the most stable paper currency in the world. As you can see, the dollar has been falling against the Swiss franc for more than 40 years. That's Porter's big trend... and it's down.


But notice the long periods where the dollar rises... despite the big trend. There was a huge bull market from 1979 to 1985, for example, and another one from 1995 to 2001.

That's the thing about markets. They never move in straight lines. They overshoot in one direction and then overshoot on the way back. And the funny thing is, just at the moment when they are most stretched in one direction, investors feel the strongest desire to join the crowd.

Take 1979 as an example. It seemed as if the dollar was about to plummet. There were incredibly compelling arguments for selling the dollar and buying hard assets... as there are today. It just wasn't a good time for selling the dollar.

I actually agree with Porter's conclusions. I just think much of the worst-case conclusions have been "priced into" the market. The financial headlines are full of stories about gold and the dollar... billionaire John Paulson buying gold... the great money manager David Einhorn buying gold... India buying gold... Chinese housewives buying gold... Warren Buffett protecting himself against inflation.

It's a popular thing to do nowadays... nothing like in the early stages of the gold bull market in 2002.

The dollar's already been in a bear market for almost 10 years, and Porter's theory has as much traction as it did in 1979. It's an incredibly compelling argument... but my gut tells me if you bet on inflation now, you're walking into an ambush.

Now just isn't the right time to be placing bets on the end of the dollar. It's the easy trade that feels right. Any great trader will tell you the "hard trade" is always the right trade.

Unless you're a short-term trader or you still don't own any gold bullion, I recommend you avoid making any new investments based on inflation or the dollar's destruction. You'll make far more money on this sort of investment when the dollar is nearing the end of a multiyear bull market... like it was in 2000.

Again... this is a matter of timing. I'm still a gold bull. I still think people should keep 5%-10% of their assets in gold, for wealth insurance... for a way to own "real money."

But I'm making the "hard bet" that interest rates will not soar in the next year. I'm making the hard bet that the dollar with strengthen. And I'm not afraid to hold cash. It's going to grow in value over the next year. And I'm going to enjoy collecting more of it from my patsy, Porter Stansberry.

Ed. Note: Tom Dyson is the author of The 12% Letter, one of my top 5 favorite investment newsletters. To sign up for a risk-free trial, click here.

Friday, October 09, 2009

The Gold & Interest Rate Paradox - in Haiku Form

Government prints cash

Gold zooms, along with script. But -

Why are rates still low?


(Source: St Louis Federal Reserve)


Tuesday, July 21, 2009

When Will Debt Deflation Turn Into Hyperinflation?

We know that, right now, we are most likely in a period of "debt deflation." Wages are falling. Prices also appear to be falling - though this is open for debate, as there are smart people who believe prices are steady or even rising. For example, Marc Faber recently said he's surprised that prices are not falling faster during this downturn, which may be an ominous sign for inflation.

But for the sake of argument, let's say that at this moment in time, we are experiencing debt deflation. When, then, will the printing of money create price inflation? Tomorrow? Next month? Next year?

I read a great explanation today in Agora's 5 Minute Forecast, where they quote guru Rob Parenteau:

When it comes to the fate of the U.S. dollar, “Two tsunami waves are crashing in to one another,” Rob Parenteau told us last night, “debt deflation on one side, and policy inflation on the other.” Rob delivered quite a speech at our first ever meeting of the Richebacher Society, amid the spectacular views of the hotel’s rooftop lounge. Our highlight came during a period of open dialogue between Rob and Riche Society members when he was asked how will we know when deflationary period is over and inflation -- or hyperinflation -- begins?

The answer, said Mr. Parenteau, is found in credit and wages. No matter how inflationary the government may be, true hyperinflation can’t be had until the consumer has access to excessive credit and his wages rise as the value of money falls. In the current environment, where credit is tight and wages are falling, rapid inflation would only be possible if there were a true crisis of confidence in the dollar. If that were to happen, he assured us, it’d be pretty obvious.

So while the current deflationary environment exists, what do we do with our money? Here's a guest article from Mr. Deflation himself, Robert Prechter, who shares 10 Things You Should and Should Not Do During Deflation.

And if you're looking for more ideas, Tom Dyson has a few as well. Tom writes the 12% Letter, an excellent publication that digs out high income ideas. Yesterday in DailyWealth, Tom had this to say about deflation:

Airline fares are also down. I just bought a nonstop ticket from Florida to Las Vegas for $120 on Southwest. This peak summer-season ticket probably would have cost twice that much last year.

Local retailers are offering big discounts, too. Last weekend, I saw three retailers advertising liquidation sales with entire store discounts of at least 50%.

Even Internet retailers are using heavy discounts. I bought some bicycle equipment online last week. I got a 40% discount on the retail price... then another 20% discount as part of a Fourth of July sale.

The Federal Reserve may be inflating our currency, but when it comes to the prices of the goods and services I use, I only see deflation.

Cheap credit is the cause. Credit's been too cheap – on and off – for the last three decades. Cheap credit caused savers to spend more than normal and entrepreneurs and businesses to borrow and build more than normal. It led to overinvestment in production and service capacity.

Last year, we reached the peak of the credit and price boom... and now prices are falling. We're in what economists call a "debt deflation."


To read Tom's full article, click here - and I'd also recommend you check out the 12% Letter if you enjoy his insights.

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Is Deflation “So 2008”? Hyperinflation Trade Looking Crowded

As the Federal Reserve continues to print money, the “hyperinflation trade” seems to be a crowded one.

The premise seems sound and reasonable – whenever a government prints money and devalues its own currency, rising prices follow. A deflationary environment cannot hold for a sustained period of time, because the government will print money, or drop dollars from helicopters, or do whatever it needs to do to create price inflation.

But is it really that simple?

If so, then gold is playing one hell of a rope-a-dope on all of us. Why has gold not been able to crank past the $1,000 mark decisively if inflation, and perhaps hyperinflation, are in the cards? After all, the market is supposed to be a forward looking mechanism!

Perhaps gold is merely climbing the “wall of worry” on the way to the final mania stage... doing a fine job at shaking out the weak hands and non-believers before ultimately skyrocketing to $1500…$2000…or higher.

Gold has risen each of the last eight years versus the dollar, and appears poised to extend that streak again this year, so maybe I’m being overly harsh.

However thus far, plays on hyperinflation have mostly disappointed. Sure, gold has rallied off it’s lows, but so have the broader markets, in what appears to be a textbook bear market rally.

Recently I’ve started wondering if there’s something fundamentally wrong with the hyperinflation hypothesis. A few weeks ago, I mused that the “buy gold” trade seemed a little overdone, at least in the short term…punctuated by Northwest Mutual’s purchase of gold for the 1st time in the company’s 152 year history.

When insurance companies are rolling up to the party, you can bet the cops are also on the way and ready to shut the joint down!

So please indulge me for a moment, and let’s ponder “what if” Helicopter Ben can’t print dollars fast enough.

Here’s what could gum up the efforts of the money printers says Robert Prechter in the June 2009 edition of The Elliott Wave Theorist:

“You can’t beat deflation in a credit based system.”

Prechter says that growth in money supply requires activity on the part of lenders and borrowers. And once a credit bubble implodes, there is no way to restart the engine.
Japan’s recent deflationary recession is a classic example of this – despite unprecedented efforts by the Japanese government to devalue the Yen and generate inflation, they weren’t able to do either!

No amount of public works projects, increases in federal spending, and monetization of debt has yet been able to snap Japan out of its deflationary nightmare. When its credit bubble popped in 1989, it stayed popped for good.

Was Japan an anomaly? With the US employing the same “hair of the dog” tactics, we’re going to find out soon!

If we had a cash based economy, then printing money would indeed cause price inflation, Prechter says. But in a credit based economy, credit is being destroyed at a much faster rate than the Fed can print.

(Roughly $14 trillion in credit down the drains so far, versus $2 trillion in deficit spending and monetization…so quite a large gap).

Eventually, enough credit is destroyed that the Fed will be able to affect the money supply. So, ironically, we could see hyperinflation at the end of this all…of whatever little money is remaining!

As engaging as this intellectual exercise is, at the end of the day we need to figure out where to put our money! There is no safe haven, after all – even if you’ve got your money in cash, you’re “long cash”…and “long” the currency you’re stocking it in!
So what are we to do?

Well, I think we’ve got to watch the charts, and listen to what the market is telling us. This is a time to protect our capital, not to reach for extra yield. If an asset class is getting taken to the cleaners…get out! That was the biggest mistake I made during the Great Deleveraging of 2008…that was the time to follow your stops, go to the beach, and catch a little R&R while the world fell apart.

That said – if we see gold smoke past $1050, $1100, etc – we probably want to be in gold. We’ll take that as a cue that our musings about credit based systems, while fun, were perhaps wrong!
For now, I think cash is not a bad place to be. With gold not yet able to break through, and the hyperinflation trade getting more crowded by the day, another burst of deflation could catch most folks with their pants down.

Remember, in a deflationary environment, cash is king…so don’t worry about yield. Cash gains purchasing power as prices deflate around it…so if you’re able to preserve your capital in nominal terms, we could do quite well in real terms!


Quick Reader Survey - Please Share Your Thoughs!

I tossed together a quick 3-question reader survey, and I'd appreciate it if you could take a minute or two to share your thoughts and suggestions with me using the survey link here.

It's always great to connect with you, and your feedback and input help me figure out where to focus my energies...namely on stuff you like, and stuff you'd like to see more of.


The Week's 5 Most Popular Posts...

Positions Update

We bought the sugar breakout this week...I don't know how much legs this rally could have - and honestly, I don't care - it's a 3-year high for sugar, so we gotta buy this breakout!

OK, if you want a fundamental reason - we've got a global deficit this year - and these can always be fun on the upside!


Current Account Value: $31,385.06

Cashed out: $20,000.00
Total value: $51,385.06
Weekly return: About even
2009 YTD return: -38.0%

2008: -8%
2007: 175%
2006: 60%
2005: 805%

Initial stake: $2,000.00

Monday, June 08, 2009

It's Still a "Bull Market" in Money Creation

The bull market in money creation is still intact!

After a short "correction" a few months ago, the printing presses are revved up and running faster than ever before.

The continued strength in equity and asset prices...much to the surprise of many smart traders...seems to be validating the theory that this bear market rally is on the inflation juice!


I would exercise extreme caution with any short positions, as this "money printing" could very well cause asset prices to go to the moon in nominal terms...even as they are being trashed in real terms!

Remember - inflation is a "hidden tax" on your savings, and one of the preferred techniques used by governments throughout the history of the world to get themselves out of deficit problems.

Friday, June 05, 2009

How Does Gold Perform in Recessions and Depressions?

I started tracking Robert Prechter of Elliott Wave International recently because, to my knowledge, he's one of the only guys who correctly anticipated the Great Crash of '08. Now, he had been waiting for this crash since he wrote Conquer the Crash in 2002, but better to be early than late in this case.

A few weeks ago I read Conquer the Crash and enjoyed it immensely. I find Prechter's analysis to be extremely well researched, grounded in solid historical examples, and frankly a bit "out there"... which challenges my own assumptions. Previously I had regarded Elliott Wave Theory as something cooky...now I find it pretty damn interesting, if perhaps still a bit cooky.

Here's a guest piece by Prechter, taking a look at the price of gold in recessions and depressions. Yesterday Jeff Clark took a look at the performance of gold miners during the Great Depression, so this is a great follow up piece. I hope you enjoy.

***

Does Gold Always Go Up in Recessions and Depressions?
June 4, 2009


By Robert Prechter, CMT

The following article is adapted from a brand-new eBook on gold and silver published by Robert Prechter, founder and CEO of the technical analysis and research firm Elliott Wave International. For the rest of this revealing 40-page eBook, download it for free here.

I have often read, “Gold always goes up in recessions and depressions.” Is it true? Should you own gold because you think the economy is tanking? Whenever we hear some claim like this, we always do the same thing: We look at the data.

The first thing to point out is that gold did not make a nickel of U.S. money for anyone in any of the recessions and depressions from 1792, when the gold-based dollar was adopted, through 1969, a period of 177 years. Well, to be precise, there was a change in the valuation in 1900, when Congress changed the dollar’s value from 24.75 grains of gold, the amount established in 1792, to 23.22 grains, a devaluation of just six percent total over 108 years. The government did raise the fixed price from $20.67/oz. to $35/oz. in 1934, but that action occurred during an economic expansion, not during the Depression. In 1968, gold finally began trading away from the government’s fixed price. Even then, it slipped to a lower price of $34.95 on January 16 and 19, 1970. So the idea that gold always goes up in recessions and depressions is already shown to be wrong. It did not go up in terms of dollars in any of the (estimated) 35 recessions or three depressions during that period.

What almost always does happen during economic contractions is that the value of whatever people use as money goes up as prices for goods and services fall. When gold is used as money, its value in terms of goods and services goes up. But gold can’t go up in dollar terms when gold and dollars are equated. So no one “makes money” holding gold under these conditions. It is a fine point: What tends to go up relative to goods and services during economic contractions is money, and when gold is officially money, that’s how it behaves. What we want to know is how gold behaves in recessions and depressions when it is not officially accepted as money.

Many gold bugs say that because gold was a good investment during the Great Depression, it is a “deflation hedge.” We addressed this topic in At the Crest of a Tidal Wave (1995, p.357) and Conquer the Crash (2002, pp. 208-209). At the time, government fixed gold’s price, so it didn’t go up or down relative to dollars. Gold was a haven during that time, the same as the dollar was, since they were equated by law. But gold served as a haven because its price was fixed while everything else was crashing in price during the period of deflation. Gold bugs like to claim that gold would have gone up during that period had it not been fixed, but the crashing dollar prices for all other things suggest that in a free market gold, too, would have fallen. It would have fallen, however, from a higher level given the inflation of 1914-1929 following the creation of the Fed. So gold became worth more in dollar terms than it was in 1913, which is why it began flowing out of the country. In 1934, the government finally recognized the new reality by raising gold’s fixed price. Since 1970, markets have been in a large version of 1914-1930, except that gold has been allowed to float, so we can clearly see its inflation-related, pre-depression gains.

Observe that gold’s price remained the same for a Fibonacci 21 years after the Fed was created in 1913; it was revalued in 1934. [Ed. Note: For a full chapter on Fibonacci time considerations for gold, download the 40-page Gold and Silver eBook.] Then it held that value for 35 (a Fibonacci 34 + 1) years, through 1969. So aside from the revaluation of 1934, the inability to make money holding gold during recessions, depressions, or any time at all save for the day of the revaluation in 1934 held fast for 56 (a Fibonacci 55 + 1) years following the creation of the Fed. So even after Congress created the central bank, no one made money holding gold in a recession or depression for two generations.

In 1970, things changed dramatically. Investors lost interest in stocks and preferred owning gold instead, for a period of ten years. The same change occurred again in 2001, and so far it has lasted seven years. But, as we will see, recession had nothing to do with either of these periods of explosive price gain in the precious metals.

The period of time one chooses to collect data can make a huge difference to the outcome of a statistical study. If we were to show the entire track record from 1792, gold would show almost no movement on average during economic contractions. If we were to take only 1969 to the present, it would show much more fluctuation. To give a fairly balanced picture, combining some history with the entire modern, wild-gold era, I asked my colleague Dave Allman to compile statistics beginning at the end of World War II. This is what most economists do, because they believe “modern finance” began at that time and that things have been “normal” since then. It’s also when many data series begin. So our study fits the norm that most economists use. It also provides results entirely from the Fed era, making it relevant to current structural conditions.

[Ed. note: To study the six tables revealing gold's performance record vs. stocks and T-notes since WWII, download the 40-page Gold and Silver eBook.]

Table 1 shows the performance of gold during the 11 officially recognized recessions beginning in 1945. Although one could make a case for different start times, we took the 15th of the starting month and the 15th of the ending month as times to record the price of gold. The results speak for themselves. Even though it is accepted throughout most of the gold-bug community that gold rises in bad economic times, Table 1 shows that such is not the case.

The only reason that the average gain for gold shows a positive number at all is that gold rose significantly during one of these recessions, that of 11/73-3/75. The average gain for all ten of the other recessions is 0.16 percent, almost exactly zero. The median for all 11 recessions is also zero. If we omit the five recessions during which the price of gold was fixed, the median gain is 3.09 percent.

For long-term forecasts and more in-depth, historical analysis for precious metals, including the six revealing tables mentioned in this article, download Prechter’s FREE 40-page eBook on Gold and Silver.

Robert Prechter, Chartered Market Technician, is the founder and CEO of Elliott Wave International, author of Wall Street best-sellers Conquer the Crash and Elliott Wave Principle and editor of The Elliott Wave Theorist monthly market letter since 1979.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Marc Faber Sees US Inflation Approaching Zimbabwe Levels (!)

"Dr. Doom" Marc Faber drops the casual obervation in this Bloomberg interview that he sees inflation levels rising in the US...in fact, eventually approaching Zimbabwe levels!

Prompted by a viewer question that asked whether it's more likely the US will default on its debt, or go into hyperinflation, Faber says he "100% sure" that the US will go into hyperinflation.  He sees inflation picking up eventually, and the Fed keeping short term interest rates below the rate of inflation to stimulate consumption.

Which will then necessitate more money printing, and - boom!  Runaway inflation train...leaving the station, never coming back.

They don't call him Dr. Doom for nothing - but ignore Faber at your own peril, he's one of the few guys to call most of the recent financial disaster properly.  The guy is a fabulous thinker and visionary, he knows history down cold, and always sees developments a few steps ahead.

Also of interest in the interview, he believes this could be more than "just a bear market rally" - as he cites money printing and deficit spending as a fundamental event that is capable of driving these types of rallies.  A "crack up" boom he calls it, that "explodes at some point."

He believes Japan's equity markets will perform very well, at least respectively, over the next 5 years, as much of the world has given up on Japan.

Asia is still a favorite of Faber's as a region to invest in...he thinks money that has been in the US and Europe for years will start to find its way over to Asia.

Final tidbit from Faber right at the end...he says Natural Gas is THE most undervalued commodity right now.

Again, you can catch the full interview here - it's a good one.

More Fuzzy Math From Our Favorite Real Estate Agent

I couldn't resist sharing some hot investment advice that just came through my Inbox, from our favorite real estate agent.

To refresh your memory, here was the last gem that was sent over - an explanation about inflation that was, honest to God, the dumbest I've ever heard.

Today's insight is not as "doom and gloom" as the last tip...in fact, perhaps some opportunity knocking for the astute fuzzy mathematician.

***

One highly overlooked opportunity is duplexes. There aren't as much competition for them, they take longer to appreciate but they do produce income. I recommend them as a possibility for a long term investment, or live in one side and rent out the other. Do the math, that's a great plan!

***

Wh-wh-what???  What freaking math?

Buy one stock, sell another - do the math, that's a great investment strategy!

Oy.

Image source: Zazzle.co.uk

Sunday, May 24, 2009

This Ain't Your Grandpa's Deflation...This Week in Commodities

Common wisdom holds that depressions are inherently deflationary.  The United States in the 1930's.  Japan in the 1990's and 2000's.

Combine a depression with other deflationary factors going today in the US - demographics, deleveraging, falling asset prices, even productivity - and you've got some serious deflationary headwinds.

(As a side note - I've warmed to the view that gentle deflation, as a result of increasing productivity, is the optimal, and honest, situation that promotes both savings and economic growth.  It's silly to label all deflation as "bad" or "evil"...how can deflation created by increased productivity be bad?  But I digress.)

Ben Bernanke, a student of the Great Depression, believes that the Depression could have been averted if deflation had been averted.

Determined not to repeat the mistakes of history - or what he thought were the mistakes of history - Bernanke took unprecendented measures...first, lowering interest rates as far as they would go...next, utterly trashing the Fed's balance sheet...and finally, when all else failed, he cranked up the printing presses.

Printing money always leads to inflation...in fact, printing money...or quantitative easing...is inflation.  Rising prices - which follow - are the symptoms of inflation.  

But what if you just print the money "for a little while"?  That's right - print it up, float it out there to keep the economy from grinding to a halt - and then when things are moving again, start to pull it back in.

Doesn't it sound insane?

Well, this is what is being tried.  And as hyperinflationary as this sounds, even the most fervent inflation hounds believe it will be a year or two or three before we start to see inflation creeping into the system.

Too much credit was destroyed, the velocity of money slowed down too much...logical reasoning dictated that it would take the Fed time to print enough to make up the gap...even at the rapid rate in which they were printing.

Then a funny thing happend while we were chilling out, getting comfortable, and generally not worrying about inflation - commodity prices started to move up.  The dollar started to drop.  Bond yields started to climb.


Falling Dollar, Rising Bond Yields = An "Uh Oh" Sandwich

Remember when every investor in the world was worried about the dollar's poor fundamentals?  McDonald's was poking fun at the dollar in it's commercials...music videos were flashing euros...supermodel Gisele Bundchen asked to be paid in euros rather than dollars.

That marked a bottom - at least a short term bottom - in the dollar.  Everyone was on the same side of the trade - short the US dollar.  

When world financial markets collapsed, a global "flight to safety" and massive short covering propelled the dollar up, up, and up.  

For awhile, nobody worried about the dollar's fundamentals...at least in the short term.  The Fed's printing money?  Hey, no problem, the dollar's still the world's reserve currency.  Besides, other countries are printing money too.  Why worry?

In the meantime, the dollar quiety began to slide...and the dollar index is now sitting at its low point for 2009:

It's a quiet race to get rid of US dollars once again. 
(Source: Barchart.com)

Makes you wonder if currency fundamentals do, in fact, still matter...if printing money is indeed bearish for the value of the currency being printed.

Meanwhile, what has The Fed been doing with it's newly printed dollars?  It's been buying long dated US Treasuries to keep yields down!

Nobody else is buying this trash, so it's up to our printing presses to pick up the slack.  The Fed announced this "newly printed cash for trash" program last December - when yields on the 10 and 30 year bonds were dropping, and deflation was king.

Common wisdom held that deflation, combined with these "monetization purchases" by The Fed, would continue to drive rates down...possibly all the way to zero.

But a funny thing happened on the way to Japan...rates bottomed on December 18, 2008, and have been climbing ever since!  Long dated Treasuries have been slammed throughout the first half of 2009!

30-Year Treasuries are not behaving like we're in a deflationary environment
 (Source: Barchart.com)

Uh oh...this is not good.  What a Fed to do?

If they let interest rates rise - that will surely squash whatever is left of the US consumer.  Green shoots turn into marajuana buds - game over.

But the only way to prevent interest rates from rising in the near term (short of cutting government debt, which we know is not going to happen) - is to step up their purchase of long term bonds.

So applying a little game theory to the Fed's current hand - we have to expect them to sacrifice the dollar.

The twist, I believe, is that the dollar could get trashed quite soon.  So I would strongly advise you to take a hard look at your savings and investments - right now.  

Charts don't lie.  No matter what our personal beliefs or biases are about the future, no matter what we think is going happen - we have to defer to what the markets are telling us.  And right now, the markets are starting to say "uh oh."

It could be a breathtaking move out of the dollar - it's value could feasibly get trashed in a matter of weeks, days, or even hours.  Don't be the one left holding the "Old Maid" card as the rest of the world runs for the exits. 



Positions Update - Back in the High Life Again!

What a week put by the Aussie...while the USD tanked, the A$ soared - moving up over 3.5 cents in one week!

I believe the Australian dollar could continue to rally further from here, and will be holding this position until we see a change in the trend.  Because we know that the trend is our friend!

OJ was down slightly on the week...some rain in Florida to snap the drought.  Prices held strong though...they could be consolidating before the next move higher.  We're still at fairly cheap prices on OJ, so there is room on the upside.

Not to cry over spilt milk - or in this case, spilt sugar - but I should not have "taken profits" in my sugar positions last week.  Just goes to show that when the trend is on your side, you don't sell and wait for a pullback...because it may never come!

Shame on me, and now I sit on the sidelines, waiting for a further breakout to the upside to reinitiate this position.

Finally with a little dry powder sitting around, I decided to "punt" on a Mini Soybeans contract on Friday.  Beans have been extremely strong, driven by demand from...you guessed it...China.  The soybean complex is a favorite of the Chinese - more so than corn and wheat - and as a result, beans have leading the pack as far as the grains go.

Soybeans are on the move, driven by Chinese demand. 
(Source: Barchart.com)


Current Account Value: $31,836.61

Cashed out: $20,000.00
Total value: $51,836.61
Weekly return: 11.6%
2009 YTD return: -37.3% (Don't call it a comeback??)

Prior year's results:
2008: -8%
2007: 175%
2006: 60%
2005: 805%

Initial stake: $2,000.00

Monday, May 18, 2009

Why The Government Will Have To Monetize The Federal Deficit

Seems like the government has never made a deficit projection it couldn't miss.  Well believe it or not, things are about to get a lot uglier than any of us had expected.  

Casey Research's David Galland, one of the very best investment writers and thinkers in my opinion, writes that falling tax revenue is going to force the government's hand very soon.  What does it mean for your investments...and livelihood?  Read on to find out...

***

Tax Revenues Tanking
By David Galland, Managing Editor, The Casey Report

While everyone else has been focused on the banks’ stress tests and how much government is spending to bail out troubled “too big to fails,” a disturbing trend on the other side of the equation is now emerging: how much (or rather, how little) the U.S. government is receiving in tax revenues.

After combing through the past 25 editions of the “Monthly Treasury Statement of Receipts and Outlays of the United States Government,” which is compiled and published by the Treasury Department’s Financial Management Service, we created the following chart.




Here’s what’s going on:
  • In 2007 and 2008, government tax revenues averaged about $633.15 billion per quarter. For the first quarter of 2009, however, the numbers just in tell us that tax receipts totaled only about $442.39 billion -- a decline of 30%.
  • Looking to confirm the trend, we compared the data for April – the big kahuna of tax collection months – to the 2007-2008 average, and found that individual income taxes this year were down more than 40%. The situation is even worse for corporate income taxes, which were down a stunning 67%!
  • When you add in all revenue from all sources (including Social Security revenue, government fees, etc.), the fiscal year-to-date – October through April – revenue shortfall comes to 19%, vs. the 14.6% projected in Obama’s budget. If, however, the accelerating shortfall apparent year-to-date, and in April in particular, continues, the spread between projected and actual tax receipts will widen considerably.

Tellingly, for the first time since 1983, the U.S. government posted a deficit in April. That’s a big swing in the wrong direction, as the bump in personal tax collections in April historically results in a big surplus -- on average about $68 billion.

What are the implications of this tanking tax revenue?

For starters, it means the federal government deficit is going be as bad or worse than the $2.5 trillion Bud Conrad, chief economist of Casey Research, projected it to be last year.

If the shortfall in individual and corporate tax revenue persists -- and we expect it will -- then the deep hole the government is already digging for itself will be that much deeper.

Using the government’s own expense projections, the revenue shortfall, even if it doesn’t worsen further, would push the fiscal 2009 budget deficit up to about $1.958 trillion. For reasons we’ve discussed at some length in The Casey Report, those expense projections are likely to be significantly understated.

Case in point, in January the government projected a $1.2 trillion deficit for fiscal year 2009… in March, just three months later, they upped the projection to $1.8 trillion. That $600 billion “adjustment” alone totaled more than any full-year budget deficit in the nation’s history.



Yet, the real fly in the ointment is that the actual borrowing by the Treasury is likely to be at least half a trillion dollars more than the deficit.

That’s because the Treasury is buying toxic paper (mortgage, credit card loans, etc.) and putting them on the books with a higher value than the market is willing to assign. While that makes the budget deficit appear smaller, it doesn’t negate the fact that the government still must borrow the money needed to buy the toxic paper in the first place. The additional revenue shortfall means they have to raise that much more money. Based on the struggle they had pushing the $14 billion in long-term notes at the latest auction, it becomes increasingly apparent that when push comes to shove, the only way the government is going to come up with the money needed to meet its aggressive spending is to print it up.

In other words, events are rolling out almost exactly as we have been anticipating. Below, for example, are some useful excerpts from an April 3 article titled “Widening Deficits” by Casey Research CEO Olivier Garret. To quote…

In the midst of the Great Depression, the 1931 federal tax revenues had fallen by 52% from their 1929 highs. While we do not expect anything that dramatic in 2009, it would not be unrealistic to see a 20% to 25% reduction in cash flow from tax collections this tax season. Such a drop would pose significant challenges given that spending commitments are off the charts and climbing.

Later in that same article, Olivier continued,

In the absence of sizeable increases in tax revenues, it is quite clear that the lion’s share of the planned sales of Treasuries in 2009 cannot be met by demand from the market. Either the Treasury will have to raise interest rates significantly, or the Fed will need to step in very aggressively to support the planned auctions. Our expectation is that both will happen. Auctions will fail and the Fed will step in. The market will react to more printing by anticipating inflation and demanding higher interest rates. Once the cycle starts, it will be very hard to pull interest rates back.

We continue to stand by our December forecast that the 2009 budget deficit is more likely to widen to levels between $2.5 and $3 trillion rather than the CBO’s $1.8 trillion forecast. We also believe that inflation could start setting in as early as Q3 of 2009 and will accelerate sharply by 2010. Treasury Rates will start climbing and the era of cheap money will end, making it harder for overleveraged consumers, businesses, and governments to service their debt.

Olivier’s forecast of failed auctions and rising interest rates on Treasuries proved more prophetic as a May 7th story from Bloomberg reported:
Treasury 30-year bonds fell the most in four months as investors demanded higher-than-forecasted yields at today’s auction of $14 billion of the securities with the U.S. slated to sell a record amount of debt this year.

“This is a problem,” said Chris Ahrens, head interest-rate strategist at UBS AG in Stamford, Connecticut, one of 16 primary dealers required to bid in Treasury auctions. “The market required a fairly significant discount to buy the bonds.”

Thirty-year bonds have lost investors 20.9 percent this year, Merrill Lynch & Co. indexes show, as the Treasury increases securities sales to help fund a swelling budget deficit. Yields climbed to a six-month high today as the auction drew a yield of 4.288 percent, higher than the 4.192 percent average forecast in a Bloomberg News survey of seven primary dealers. Demand was below average, judging by total bids.

The benchmark 30-year bond yield climbed 23 basis points, or 0.23 percentage points, the most since Jan. 5, to 4.316 percent, at 5:25 p.m. in New York, according to BGCantor Market data. It was the highest yield since Nov. 14. The 3.5 percent security due in February 2039 dropped 3 15/32, or $34.69 per $1,000 face amount, to 86 3/8.

The 10-year note yield increased 16 basis points to 3.345 percent, the highest since Nov. 24.

Two-year notes yielded 1 percent for the first time since March 18, while the rate on the three-month Treasury bill was 0.18 percent.

So, what does all this mean?

As per above, the rock-and-the-hard-place scenario we have been predicting is unfolding before our eyes. At this point, other than sharply changing course and letting the free market cope with the crisis through a brutal “survival of the fittest” scenario, the government is left with no other option than to accelerate its buying up of its own debt.

Which is to say, it must push even harder on the levers of its printing presses, further setting the stage for the massive period of inflation we continue to see as inevitable… and for the stunning rise in interest rates we are now positioning ourselves for in The Casey Report (and, you can too… learn more).

Ed. Note - I subscribe to the Casey Report myself...it's my favorite of all investment newsletters that I have.

Most Popular Articles This Month